Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21968815›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2011

Quantitative computed tomography and computed tomography in children.

Babette S Zemel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bone morbidity in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Methodologies to assess paediatric adiposity.Irish journal of medical science · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Babette S ZemelDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399, USA. zemel@email.chop.edu
California University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) methodologies have been instrumental in deepening our understanding of bone acquisition and strength during childhood. Important publications in the last year have drawn attention to the functional muscle-bone unit, showing that factors such as population ancestry, bone size, and muscle composition are additional dimensions of bone strength that affect muscle-bone relationships. The role of adiposity in pediatric bone health is complex and may vary by sex, puberty stage, and degree of obesity. Several new studies have demonstrated the association of peripheral QCT (pQCT) outcomes with fracture, although pQCT outcomes are not superior to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measures in this regard. New high-resolution pQCT studies document transient weakness in mid-puberty that coincides developmentally with the period of peak fracture incidence. These new studies will ultimately help us understand the development of sex differences in bone strength that emerge in adolescence.

Indexed as

AdiposityAdolescentBone and BonesBone DensityBone DevelopmentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMuscle, SkeletalNutritional Physiological PhenomenaSex CharacteristicsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID21968815
OpenAlexW2074187133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.