ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2012
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic tissue compartment model selection in drug development and risk assessment.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunities for machine learning and artificial intelligence in physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2025Review
- Operational stability study of lactate biosensors: modeling, parameter identification, and stability analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- A Computational Framework for Studying Gut-Brain Axis in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Utilization of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics: an Overview.Current pharmacology reports · 2020Review
- Revisiting a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for cocaine with a forensic scope.Toxicology research · 2019Article
- An Algorithm and R Program for Fitting and Simulation of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2017Article
- NovelToxicology research · 2013Review
- Use of partition coefficients in flow-limited physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2012Article
- Cutting Edge PBPK Models and Analyses: Providing the Basis for Future Modeling Efforts and Bridges to Emerging Toxicology Paradigms.Journal of toxicology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A well-stirred tank (WST) has been the predominant flow-limited tissue compartment model in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Recently, we developed a two-region asymptotically reduced (TAR) PBPK tissue compartment model through an asymptotic approximation to a two-region vascular-extravascular system to incorporate more biophysical detail than the WST model. To determine the relevance of a flow-limited TAR (F-TAR) approach, 75 structurally diverse drugs were evaluated herein using a priori predicted tissue:plasma partition coefficients along with hybrid and whole-body PBPK of eight rat tissues to determine the impact of model selection on simulation and optimization. Simulations showed that the F-TAR model significantly improved the ability to predict drug exposure, with hybrid and whole-body WST model error approaching 50% for tissues with larger vascular volumes. When optimization was used to fit F-TAR and WST models to pseudo data, WST-optimized drug partition coefficients more appropriately represented curve-fitting parameters rather than biophysically meaningful partition coefficients. Median F-TAR-optimized error ranged from -0.4% to +0.3%, whereas WST-optimized median error ranged from -22.2% to +1.8%. These studies demonstrated that the use of F-TAR represents a more accurate, biophysically realistic PBPK tissue model for predicting tissue exposure to drug and that it should be considered for use in drug development and regulatory review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.