Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21968723›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012

Regional spread and control of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis in Kyoto, Japan.

A Matsushima, S Takakura, M Yamamoto, Y Matsumura, M Shirano, M Nagao, Y Ito, Y Iinuma, T Shimizu, N Fujita and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Control of emerging extensively drug-resistant organisms (eXDRO) in France: a survey among infection preventionists from 286 healthcare facilities.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

A MatsushimaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan. akimat@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
S Takakura
M Yamamoto
Y Matsumura
M Shirano
M Nagao
Y Ito
Y Iinuma
T Shimizu
N Fujita
S Ichiyama
Kyoto University · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPKanazawa Medical University · JPKyoto City Hospital · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to control the post-outbreak prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in the affected Kyoto region. The study period was from 2005 to 2010. Faecal samples were subjected to VRE screening, and vancomycin resistance genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The genotype was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of genomic DNA digested with SmaI and by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A VRE control programme was established in 2006, consisting of a laboratory-based faecal VRE screening system, annual surveillance of hospital inpatients and the promotion of adequate infection control measures. vanA-Enterococcus faecium, vanB-E. faecium and vanB-E. faecalis were detected at 35, 12 and 5 hospitals, respectively. Genotype analysis revealed that all of the vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates obtained since 2005 belonged to ST78, and that clonally related vanB-E. faecalis of ST64 had spread to three hospitals. The rate of faecal VRE carriage among the patients enrolled in the annual surveillance increased until 2007, when it reached 24 (1.2%) of the 2,035 enrolled patients. The rate began to decrease in 2008 and, by 2010, reached a low of 4 (0.17%) of the 2,408 enrolled patients. While VRE did spread within the Kyoto region, the VRE control programme succeeded in controlling the overall VRE spread.

Indexed as

Vancomycin ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarrier StateCross InfectionElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumFecesGenotypeGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansInfection ControlJapanMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologyMultilocus Sequence TypingAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID21968723
OpenAlexW2463876675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.