Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21967899›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2011

Rapid elimination of CO through the lungs: coming full circle 100 years on.

Joseph A Fisher, Steve Iscoe, Ludwik Fedorko, James Duffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Factors Contributing to CO Uptake and Elimination in the Body: A Critical Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  6. Effect of Pressure Support Ventilation on Carboxyhemoglobin Toxicokinetic after Acute Carbon Monoxide Intoxication: a Swine Model.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2018
    Article
  7. Smoke Inhalation Injury: Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2018
    Review
  8. Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: Pathogenesis, Management, and Future Directions of Therapy.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Carbon monoxide toxicity after lighting coals at a hookah bar.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph A FisherDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. joe.fisher@utoronto.ca
Steve Iscoe
Ludwik Fedorko
James Duffin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the start of the 20th century, CO poisoning was treated by administering a combination of CO(2) and O(2) (carbogen) to stimulate ventilation. This treatment was reported to be highly effective, even reversing the deep coma of severe CO poisoning before patients arrived at the hospital. The efficacy of carbogen in treating CO poisoning was initially attributed to the absorption of CO(2); however, it was eventually realized that the increase in pulmonary ventilation was the predominant factor accelerating clearance of CO from the blood. The inhaled CO(2) in the carbogen stimulated ventilation but prevented hypocapnia and the resulting reductions in cerebral blood flow. By then, however, carbogen treatment for CO poisoning had been abandoned in favour of hyperbaric O(2). Now, a half-century later, there is accumulating evidence that hyperbaric O(2) is not efficacious, most probably because of delays in initiating treatment. We now also know that increases in pulmonary ventilation with O(2)-enriched gas can clear CO from the blood as fast, or very nearly as fast, as hyperbaric O(2). Compared with hyperbaric O(2), the technology for accelerating pulmonary clearance of CO with hyperoxic gas is not only portable and inexpensive, but also may be far more effective because treatment can be initiated sooner. In addition, the technology can be distributed more widely, especially in developing countries where the prevalence of CO poisoning is highest. Finally, early pulmonary CO clearance does not delay or preclude any other treatment, including subsequent treatment with hyperbaric O(2).

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideCarbon Monoxide PoisoningCarboxyhemoglobinFemaleFetal DiseasesHumansHyperbaric OxygenationKineticsLungOxygenPregnancyPulmonary VentilationSheepTime FactorscarbogenCarbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideCarboxyhemoglobinOxygen

Identifiers

PMID21967899
PMCPMC3274699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.