Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21967830›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2011

Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of a cluster randomized controlled trial of pay for performance for hypertension treatment: study protocol.

Laura A Petersen, Tracy Urech, Kate Simpson, Kenneth Pietz, Sylvia J Hysong, Jochen Profit, Douglas Conrad, R Adams Dudley, Meghan Z Lutschg, Robert Petzel and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00302718 (RCT of Financial Incentives to Translate ALLHAT Into Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00302718 nacompletednot on this map

RCT of Financial Incentives to Translate ALLHAT Into Practice

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2007 to 2012Enrolled83ConditionsHypertensionArmsPhysician-level financial incentives, Practice-level financial incentives, Physician- and practice-level financial incentives
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Patient and physician adherence in hypertension management.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura A PetersenHealth Policy and Quality Program, Michael E, DeBakey VA Medical Center Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, and Section for Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. laurap@bcm.tmc.edu
Tracy Urech
Kate Simpson
Kenneth Pietz
Sylvia J Hysong
Jochen Profit
Douglas Conrad
R Adams Dudley
Meghan Z Lutschg
Robert Petzel
Lechauncy D Woodard

Funding

Financial Incentives to Translate ALLHAT into PracticeR01HL079173 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PETERSEN, LAURA A · 2005 to 2011
$3.3M
Development and Validation of a Scorecard of Neonatal Intensive Care QualityK23HD056298 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PROFIT, JOCHEN · 2007 to 2011
$682k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01HL079173-S1NHLBI NIH HHS NIH R01 HL079173-01NICHD NIH HHS 1 K23 HD056298-01PHS HHS NHLBI 1R01HL079173-S2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite compelling evidence of the benefits of treatment and well-accepted guidelines for treatment, hypertension is controlled in less than one-half of United States citizens. METHODS/

designThis randomized controlled trial tests whether explicit financial incentives promote the translation of guideline-recommended care for hypertension into clinical practice and improve blood pressure (BP) control in the primary care setting. Using constrained randomization, we assigned 12 Veterans Affairs hospital outpatient clinics to four study arms: physician-level incentive; group-level incentive; combination of physician and group incentives; and no incentives (control). All participants at the hospital (cluster) were assigned to the same study arm. We enrolled 83 full-time primary care physicians and 42 non-physician personnel. The intervention consisted of an educational session about guideline-recommended care for hypertension, five audit and feedback reports, and five disbursements of incentive payments. Incentive payments rewarded participants for chart-documented use of guideline-recommended antihypertensive medications, BP control, and appropriate responses to uncontrolled BP during a prior four-month performance period over the 20-month intervention. To identify potential unintended consequences of the incentives, the study team interviewed study participants, as well as non-participant primary care personnel and leadership at study sites. Chart reviews included data collection on quality measures not related to hypertension. To evaluate the persistence of the effect of the incentives, the study design includes a washout period. DISCUSSION: We briefly describe the rationale for the interventions being studied, as well as the major design choices. Rigorous research designs such as the one described here are necessary to determine whether performance-based payment arrangements such as financial incentives result in meaningful quality improvements.

trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.govNCT00302718.

Indexed as

FemaleGuideline AdherenceHospitals, VeteransHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedOutpatient Clinics, HospitalRandom AllocationReimbursement, IncentiveResearch DesignSample Size

Identifiers

PMID21967830
PMCPMC3197549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.