Trial reportClinical drug investigation2011
Long-term assessment of topiramate for epilepsy: an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, prospective study in a naturalistic setting.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex Differences in Adverse Effects of Antiseizure Medications in Adults with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.CNS drugs · 2024Pooled it
- Movement disorders associated with antiseizure medications: A systematic review.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveMost patients with epilepsy require long-term medical therapy. Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) appear to be overall similarly effective to older agents but may be better tolerated. However, most of the clinical data available for newer AEDs derive from a number of short-term studies. The objective of this study was to explore long-term outcomes in patients with epilepsy treated with topiramate in routine clinical practice.
methodsThis was an open-label, multicentre, optional follow-up monotherapy study that included adolescents and adults with epilepsy who completed two similarly designed 28- or 30-week studies and agreed to participate for an additional 52 weeks. Seizure types and frequency, topiramate dose, vital signs and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) after 12, 26, 39 and 52 weeks were documented. Post hoc analyses to explore differences between males and females were conducted.
results114 patients (49.0% women, mean ± SD age 43 ± 17.5 years) with a mean ± SD disease duration of 61 ± 118 months (men 54 ± 96 vs women 68 ± 138 months) were followed up for a median of 18.5 months. Seventy-eight percent of patients completed the study. Reasons for premature discontinuation were: loss to follow-up (10.5%), TEAE (5.3%), lack of efficacy (2.6%), non-adherence (0.9%) and other reasons (4.4%). Seizure frequency per 4 weeks decreased from a mean ± SD 5.0 ± 28.3 at baseline to 0.6 ± 2.1 during the whole observation period. Fifty-four patients (52.9%) were seizure free during the whole observation period. In addition, 69 of 95 patients (72.6%) whose topiramate therapy was stable within a range of ±50 mg/day for a period of at least 12 months (maintenance phase) were seizure free while treated with a median topiramate dose of 100 mg/day. The most frequently reported TEAEs were paraesthesias (13.2% of patients), dizziness (7.0%) and seizure-related events (7.0%). No significant differences between males and females were found for treatment response or retention.
conclusionTopiramate is an effective and well tolerated long-term treatment option for adolescents and adults with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.