ArticleCommunicative & integrative biology2011
A new model for caste development in social wasps.
Article in Communicative & integrative biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Chemical Communication and Reproduction Partitioning in Social Wasps.Journal of chemical ecology · 2018Review
- Caste-fate determination primarily occurs after adult emergence in a primitively eusocial paper wasp: significance of the photoperiod during the adult stage.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2018Article
- Emergence of cooperation and division of labor in the primitively eusocial waspProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Maternal and nourishment factors interact to influence offspring developmental trajectories in social wasps.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017Article
- Phylogenetic tests reject Emery's rule in the evolution of social parasitism in yellowjackets and hornets (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Vespinae).Royal Society open science · 2015Article
- Nourishment level affects caste-related gene expression in Polistes wasps.BMC genomics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Specialization into reproductive and non-reproductive castes is one of the defining traits of eusocial insects. Knowledge of the proximal causes of caste differentiation is therefore central to achieving an understanding of the evolution of eusociality. Castes are an example of a polyphenism, multiple, discrete phenotypes arising from a single genotype in response to differing environmental conditions. Here we focus on recent work in the social wasps to provide insight into how environmental conditions may trigger the development of caste across a range from independent- to swarm-founding social species. The amount of food larvae receive has long been recognized as a key input factor in the determination of caste, but that alone is insufficient to account for the range of combinations of size, development time and caste among the female offspring of Polistes, an independent-founding wasp. Recent experimental work on P. fuscatus has shown that vibrations that are associated with the feeding of larvae are another essential environmental input in the determination of caste. we present a model of how vibrational signaling in the context of feeding larvae could interact with nutritional input to account for the developmental patterns seen in these wasps. Mapping the distribution of vibrational signaling onto a phylogeny of the social wasps suggests that this trait characterized the common ancestor of the subfamilies vespinae + Polistinae, diversified in the independent-founding species, then was superseded by caste-determining mechanisms in the swarm-founding and vespine species that function more effectively in larger colonies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.