Trial reportPloS one2011
Short-term visual deprivation does not enhance passive tactile spatial acuity.
Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of immediate vision on implicit hand maps.Experimental brain research · 2014Trial
- Vision Fine-Tunes Predictions of Bimanual Self-Touch.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- A protocol for tactile function assessment using JVP domes: Feasibility study and preliminary results.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Visualizing 3D imagery by mouth using candy-like models.Science advances · 2021Article
- Preserved tactile acuity in older pianists.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019Article
- Short-term visual deprivation boosts the flexibility of body representation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
- Eye closure enhances dark night perceptions.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Short-term visual deprivation reduces interference effects of task-irrelevant facial expressions on affective prosody judgments.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2015Article
- Short-term visual deprivation, tactile acuity, and haptic solid shape discrimination.PloS one · 2014Article
- Compensatory plasticity: time matters.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Review
- Tactile acuity charts: a reliable measure of spatial acuity.PloS one · 2014Article
- A physical constraint on perceptual learning: tactile spatial acuity improves with training to a limit set by finger size.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013Article
- Article
- Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An important unresolved question in sensory neuroscience is whether, and if so with what time course, tactile perception is enhanced by visual deprivation. In three experiments involving 158 normally sighted human participants, we assessed whether tactile spatial acuity improves with short-term visual deprivation over periods ranging from under 10 to over 110 minutes. We used an automated, precisely controlled two-interval forced-choice grating orientation task to assess each participant's ability to discern the orientation of square-wave gratings pressed against the stationary index finger pad of the dominant hand. A two-down one-up staircase (Experiment 1) or a Bayesian adaptive procedure (Experiments 2 and 3) was used to determine the groove width of the grating whose orientation each participant could reliably discriminate. The experiments consistently showed that tactile grating orientation discrimination does not improve with short-term visual deprivation. In fact, we found that tactile performance degraded slightly but significantly upon a brief period of visual deprivation (Experiment 1) and did not improve over periods of up to 110 minutes of deprivation (Experiments 2 and 3). The results additionally showed that grating orientation discrimination tends to improve upon repeated testing, and confirmed that women significantly outperform men on the grating orientation task. We conclude that, contrary to two recent reports but consistent with an earlier literature, passive tactile spatial acuity is not enhanced by short-term visual deprivation. Our findings have important theoretical and practical implications. On the theoretical side, the findings set limits on the time course over which neural mechanisms such as crossmodal plasticity may operate to drive sensory changes; on the practical side, the findings suggest that researchers who compare tactile acuity of blind and sighted participants should not blindfold the sighted participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.