Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21966478›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2011

Short-term visual deprivation does not enhance passive tactile spatial acuity.

Michael Wong, Erik Hackeman, Caitlin Hurd, Daniel Goldreich

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Vision Fine-Tunes Predictions of Bimanual Self-Touch.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Preserved tactile acuity in older pianists.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Compensatory plasticity: time matters.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. A physical constraint on perceptual learning: tactile spatial acuity improves with training to a limit set by finger size.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael WongMcMaster Integrative Neuroscience Discovery and Study, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Erik Hackeman
Caitlin Hurd
Daniel Goldreich

Funding

The Tactile Acuity of Blind and Sighted PersonsR15EY013649 · NEI · DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDREICH, DANIEL · 2001 to 2001
$146k
NEI NIH HHS R15 EY013649NEI NIH HHS R15 EY13649-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important unresolved question in sensory neuroscience is whether, and if so with what time course, tactile perception is enhanced by visual deprivation. In three experiments involving 158 normally sighted human participants, we assessed whether tactile spatial acuity improves with short-term visual deprivation over periods ranging from under 10 to over 110 minutes. We used an automated, precisely controlled two-interval forced-choice grating orientation task to assess each participant's ability to discern the orientation of square-wave gratings pressed against the stationary index finger pad of the dominant hand. A two-down one-up staircase (Experiment 1) or a Bayesian adaptive procedure (Experiments 2 and 3) was used to determine the groove width of the grating whose orientation each participant could reliably discriminate. The experiments consistently showed that tactile grating orientation discrimination does not improve with short-term visual deprivation. In fact, we found that tactile performance degraded slightly but significantly upon a brief period of visual deprivation (Experiment 1) and did not improve over periods of up to 110 minutes of deprivation (Experiments 2 and 3). The results additionally showed that grating orientation discrimination tends to improve upon repeated testing, and confirmed that women significantly outperform men on the grating orientation task. We conclude that, contrary to two recent reports but consistent with an earlier literature, passive tactile spatial acuity is not enhanced by short-term visual deprivation. Our findings have important theoretical and practical implications. On the theoretical side, the findings set limits on the time course over which neural mechanisms such as crossmodal plasticity may operate to drive sensory changes; on the practical side, the findings suggest that researchers who compare tactile acuity of blind and sighted participants should not blindfold the sighted participants.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSpace PerceptionTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21966478
PMCPMC3179498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.