ArticlePloS one2011
Incident dementia in a defined older Chinese population.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Population attributable fractions of a wide range of peripheral diseases for the burden of dementia.Nature human behaviour · 2026Pooled it
- Social class and the risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prospective longitudinal studies.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2023Pooled it
- Association between loneliness and dementia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Associations between coronary heart disease and risk of cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis.Brain and behavior · 2021Pooled it
- The Relationship of Coronary Artery Calcium and Clinical Coronary Artery Disease with Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020Pooled it
- Stroke and dementia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Coronary heart disease and risk for cognitive impairment or dementia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Is my loneliness killing me? Effects of loneliness and social isolation on transitions between cognitive status categories and death.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2026Article
- Dementia risk reduction in China: Country-specific estimates of modifiable risk factors and population attributable fractions (PAFs).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- A Meta-analysis of Loneliness and Risk of Dementia using Longitudinal Data from >600,000 Individuals.Nature. Mental health · 2024Article
- Contributions of loneliness to cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults are independent of other risk factors and Alzheimer's pathology: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Review
- Research on the aging-suitability of community outdoor spaces in Zhengzhou based on the analytic hierarchy process and semantic differential method.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Socioeconomic and Contextual Differentials in Memory Decline: A Cross-Country Investigation Between England and China.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023Article
- What Do Randomized Controlled Trials Inform Us About Potential Disease-Modifying Strategies for Parkinson's Disease?Neuromolecular medicine · 2023Review
- The Impact of Loneliness and Social Isolation on Cognitive Aging: A Narrative Review.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2023Review
- Impact of fish consumption on all-cause mortality in older people with and without dementia: a community-based cohort study.European journal of nutrition · 2022Article
- Association of Low Emotional and Tangible Support With Risk of Dementia Among Adults 60 Years and Older in South Korea.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- The impact of active community-based survey on dementia detection ratio in Taiwan: A cohort study with historical control.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent knowledge about incident dementia is mainly derived from studies undertaken in the West, showing that dementia is related to older age, low socio-economic status, lack of social network, depression and cardiovascular disease risk factors. We know little about incidence and predictors of dementia in China, where the prevalence is increasing and the patterns of risk factors are different.
methodsUsing a standard interview method, we examined 1526 non-demented people aged ≥65 years who had at least minimal educational level in China in a 7.5-year follow up. Incident dementia was diagnosed by GMS-AGECAT algorithms and psychiatrists.
resultsAge-standardised incidence of dementia was 14.7 per 1000 person-years (95%CI 11.3-18.2 per 1000 person-years). The increased risk was significantly associated with age, female gender (adjusted odds ratio 2.48, 95%CI 1.20-5.13), low educational levels, smoking, angina (2.58, 1.01-6.59) and living with fewer family members. Among participants with low educational level, the increased risk was associated with higher income, and with the highest and lowest occupational classes; adjusted odds ratio 2.74 (95%CI 1.12-6.70) for officers/teachers, 3.11 (1.61-6.01) for manual labourers/peasants.
conclusionsOur findings of high incidence of dementia and increased risk among people having low education levels but high income suggest a more potential epidemic and burden of dementia populations in China. Maintaining social network and activities and reducing cardiovascular factors in late life could be integrated into current multi-faceted preventive strategies for curbing the epidemic of dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.