Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21966319›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2011

Regional differences in acute stroke admission and thrombolysis rates in the German federal state of Hesse.

Erwin Stolz, Gerhard F Hamann, Manfred Kaps, Björn Misselwitz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erwin StolzNeurologische Klinik, Caritasklinik St. Theresia, Saarbrücken.
Gerhard F Hamann
Manfred Kaps
Björn Misselwitz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing data from the mandatory quality assurance program for stroke care in Hesse, we analyze regional differences in thrombolysis rates and infer some ways in which care can be improved.

methodsWe identified 7707 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were admitted to hospital within 3 hours of symptom onset in 2007 and 2008, and we determined the local thrombolysis rate district by district. In order to exclude the possibility that the observed local differences in thrombolysis rates might be accounted for, in large part, by off-label thrombolysis procedures, we further narrowed down the subgroup of patients who underwent thrombolysis to the 1108 patients admitted within 2 hours of symptom onset. We also analyzed the local thrombolysis rates for patients who were primarily referred to stroke units.

resultsThe overall thrombolysis rate among patients admitted within 3 hours of symptom onset was 19%, varying locally from 6% to 35%. Among patients admitted within 2 hours of symptom onset, the local thrombolysis rate ranged from 13% to 85%. Even in patients primarily referred to stroke units, the local thrombolysis rate ranged from 8% to 44% in the 3-hour group and from 16% to 62% in the 2-hour group.

conclusionLocal thrombolysis rates vary unexpectedly widely across the state of Hesse. The care of patients with acute stroke after they reach the hospital urgently needs critical reappraisal and improvement.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebral InfarctionCohort StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleGermanyHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHospital UnitsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsPatient Admission

Identifiers

PMID21966319
PMCPMC3183304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.