Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21966277›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

Inference of relationships in population data using identity-by-descent and identity-by-state.

Eric L Stevens, Greg Heckenberg, Elisha D O Roberson, Joseph D Baugher, Thomas J Downey, Jonathan Pevsner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Parent-offspring inference in inbred populations.Molecular ecology resources · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric L StevensProgram in Human Genetics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Greg Heckenberg
Elisha D O Roberson
Joseph D Baugher
Thomas J Downey
Jonathan Pevsner

Funding

NICHD MENTAL RETARDATION RESEARCH CENTER CORE GRANTP30HD024061 · NICHD · KENNEDY KRIEGER CHILDRENS HOSPITAL · PI VALLE, DAVID · 1988 to 2013
$15.8M
Predoctoral Training Program in Human GeneticsT32GM007814 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VALLE, DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$10.6M
Computational tools to analyze SNP data from patients with mental illnessR43MH086192 · NIMH · PARTEK, INC. · PI DOWNEY, THOMAS · 2009 to 2009
$243k
NICHD NIH HHS HD24061NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD024061NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007814NIMH NIH HHS R43 MH086192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is an assumption of large, population-based datasets that samples are annotated accurately whether they correspond to known relationships or unrelated individuals. These annotations are key for a broad range of genetics applications. While many methods are available to assess relatedness that involve estimates of identity-by-descent (IBD) and/or identity-by-state (IBS) allele-sharing proportions, we developed a novel approach that estimates IBD0, 1, and 2 based on observed IBS within windows. When combined with genome-wide IBS information, it provides an intuitive and practical graphical approach with the capacity to analyze datasets with thousands of samples without prior information about relatedness between individuals or haplotypes. We applied the method to a commonly used Human Variation Panel consisting of 400 nominally unrelated individuals. Surprisingly, we identified identical, parent-child, and full-sibling relationships and reconstructed pedigrees. In two instances non-sibling pairs of individuals in these pedigrees had unexpected IBD2 levels, as well as multiple regions of homozygosity, implying inbreeding. This combined method allowed us to distinguish related individuals from those having atypical heterozygosity rates and determine which individuals were outliers with respect to their designated population. Additionally, it becomes increasingly difficult to identify distant relatedness using genome-wide IBS methods alone. However, our IBD method further identified distant relatedness between individuals within populations, supported by the presence of megabase-scale regions lacking IBS0 across individual chromosomes. We benchmarked our approach against the hidden Markov model of a leading software package (PLINK), showing improved calling of distantly related individuals, and we validated it using a known pedigree from a clinical study. The application of this approach could improve genome-wide association, linkage, heterozygosity, and other population genomics studies that rely on SNP genotype data.

Indexed as

PedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsAllelesComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalGenetic LinkageGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHaplotypesHomozygoteHumansMarkov ChainsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID21966277
PMCPMC3178600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.