ArticlePLoS genetics2011
Inference of relationships in population data using identity-by-descent and identity-by-state.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Population genetic considerations for using biobanks as international resources in the pandemic era and beyond.BMC genomics · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- An olive parentage atlas: founder cultivars, regional diversification, and implications for breeding programs.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Machine learning reveals complex genetics of fungal resistance in sorghum grain mold.Heredity · 2025Article
- clusIBD: Robust Detection of Identity-by-descent Segments Using Unphased Genetic Data from Poor-quality Samples.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Genomic epidemiology of Plasmodium knowlesi reveals putative genetic drivers of adaptation in Malaysia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluating the use of statistical and machine learning methods for estimating breed composition of purebred and crossbred animals in thirteen cattle breeds using genomic information.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Exploring how space, time, and sampling impact our ability to measure genetic structure acrossFrontiers in epidemiology · 2023Article
- Development of a new screening method for faster kinship analyses in mass disasters: a proof of concept study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Parent-offspring inference in inbred populations.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Article
- A machine learning approach for missing persons cases with high genotyping errors.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Genetic analysis of the early bud flush trait of tea plants (Horticulture research · 2022Article
- A pipeline for RNA-seq based eQTL analysis with automated quality control procedures.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
- Case Report: Two Monochorionic Twins With a Critically Different Course of Progressive Osseus Heteroplasia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Discovery of Genomic Characteristics and Selection Signatures in Southern Chinese Local Cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Estimating Relatedness Between Malaria Parasites.Genetics · 2019Article
- Genome-wide scan reveals genetic divergence and diverse adaptive selection in Chinese local cattle.BMC genomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is an assumption of large, population-based datasets that samples are annotated accurately whether they correspond to known relationships or unrelated individuals. These annotations are key for a broad range of genetics applications. While many methods are available to assess relatedness that involve estimates of identity-by-descent (IBD) and/or identity-by-state (IBS) allele-sharing proportions, we developed a novel approach that estimates IBD0, 1, and 2 based on observed IBS within windows. When combined with genome-wide IBS information, it provides an intuitive and practical graphical approach with the capacity to analyze datasets with thousands of samples without prior information about relatedness between individuals or haplotypes. We applied the method to a commonly used Human Variation Panel consisting of 400 nominally unrelated individuals. Surprisingly, we identified identical, parent-child, and full-sibling relationships and reconstructed pedigrees. In two instances non-sibling pairs of individuals in these pedigrees had unexpected IBD2 levels, as well as multiple regions of homozygosity, implying inbreeding. This combined method allowed us to distinguish related individuals from those having atypical heterozygosity rates and determine which individuals were outliers with respect to their designated population. Additionally, it becomes increasingly difficult to identify distant relatedness using genome-wide IBS methods alone. However, our IBD method further identified distant relatedness between individuals within populations, supported by the presence of megabase-scale regions lacking IBS0 across individual chromosomes. We benchmarked our approach against the hidden Markov model of a leading software package (PLINK), showing improved calling of distantly related individuals, and we validated it using a known pedigree from a clinical study. The application of this approach could improve genome-wide association, linkage, heterozygosity, and other population genomics studies that rely on SNP genotype data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.