ArticleCurrent genomics2011
Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock.
Article in Current genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translational Models for Glioblastoma: Revolutionizing Drug Development and Personalized Medicine through Clinical Insights.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Genomic characterization and insights into the belted coat pattern of a local, reconstituted pig population.Animal biotechnology · 2025Article
- Latitude-driven adaptive evolution of body length in diverse pig breeds across China.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide diversity, linkage disequilibrium, and admixture in the main Colombian Creole pig breeds.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Article
- Article
- Genetic diversity of meat quality related genes in Argentinean pigs.Veterinary and animal science · 2022Article
- Imputation of Ancient Whole GenomeFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Decellularized and Crosslinked Corneal Implants Manufactured From Porcine Corneas as a Treatment Option for Advanced Keratoconus.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Article
- Characterization of a haplotype-reference panel for genotyping by low-pass sequencing in Swiss Large White pigs.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Genomic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in European local pig breeds assessed with a high density SNP chip.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Association of Salmonella virulence factor alleles with intestinal and invasive serovars.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Assessing Sus scrofa diversity among continental United States, and Pacific islands populations using molecular markers from a gene banks collection.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Genomic evaluation of feed efficiency component traits in Duroc pigs using 80K, 650K and whole-genome sequence variants.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
- Detection of genomic structural variations in Guizhou indigenous pigs and the comparison with other breeds.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- Haplotypic diversity of porcine LEP and LEPR genes involved in growth and fatness regulation.Journal of applied genetics · 2015Article
- Improved Detection and Characterization of Copy Number Variations Among Diverse Pig Breeds by Array CGH.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Global copy number analyses by next generation sequencing provide insight into pig genome variation.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Genome evolution by matrix algorithms: cellular automata approach to population genetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have reviewed the current pig (Sus scrofa) genomic diversity within and between sites and compared them with human and other livestock. The current Porcine 60K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel has an average SNP distance in a range of 30 - 40 kb. Most of genetic variation was distributed within populations, and only a small proportion of them existed between populations. The average heterozygosity was lower in pig than in human and other livestock. Genetic inbreeding coefficient (F(IS)), population differentiation (F(ST)), and Nei's genetic distance between populations were much larger in pig than in human and other livestock. Higher average genetic distance existed between European and Asian populations than between European or between Asian populations. Asian breeds harboured much larger variability and higher average heterozygosity than European breeds. The samples of wild boar that have been analyzed displayed more extensive genetic variation than domestic breeds. The average linkage disequilibrium (LD) in improved pig breeds extended to 1 - 3 cM, much larger than that in human (~ 30 kb) and cattle (~ 100 kb), but smaller than that in sheep (~ 10 cM). European breeds showed greater LD that decayed more slowly than Asian breeds. We briefly discuss some processes for maintaining genomic diversity in pig, including migration, introgression, selection, and drift. We conclude that, due to the long time of domestication, the pig possesses lower heterozygosity, higher F(IS), and larger LD compared with human and cattle. This implies that a smaller effective population size and less informative markers are needed in pig for genome wide association studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.