ArticlePaediatrics & child health2010
Recommendations for the use of rotavirus vaccines in infants.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of publicly funded rotavirus immunization programs on Canadian children.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2021Article
- Rotavirus vaccination and short-term risk of adverse events in US infants.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2018Article
- Recommendations for the use of rotavirus vaccines in infants.Paediatrics & child health · 2017Article
- Rapid genotyping of human rotavirus using SYBR green real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction with melting curve analysis.World journal of virology · 2015Article
- Molecular characterization of rotavirus isolates from select Canadian pediatric hospitals.BMC infectious diseases · 2012Article
- Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine in preventing severe acute gastroenteritis in children.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rotavirus infection occurs in the majority of healthy children before five years of age, and is the most common diarrheal illness associated with hospitalization. The majority of children present with symptoms of vomiting, diarrhea and fever. As a result, rotavirus gastroenteritis is responsible for greater morbidity than other common childhood diarrheal illnesses. The highest risk of severe disease is in children younger than two years of age. It is estimated that one in 20 children will require an emergency department visit. In addition to community-acquired infections, hospital-acquired infections are also significant. There are currently two licensed rotavirus vaccines in Canada. Both vaccines are administered orally and are highly effective against severe disease and hospitalization. Large pre- and postmarketing studies have shown no increased risk of intussusception with the current rotavirus vaccines. The present statement provides information concerning the clinical disease and rotavirus vaccines in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.