ArticleThe Indian journal of surgery2010
Laparoscopic CBD Exploration.
Article in The Indian journal of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nomogram to predict conversion of laparoscopic surgery to laparotomy for Choledocholithiasis.BMC surgery · 2023Trial
- Management of multiple common bile duct stones via laparoscopic transcholedochal exploration: an observational study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative clinical outcomes of transcystic vs. transductal laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Incidental Intraoperatively Detected Choledocholithiasis: A General Surgeon's Approach to Management.Cureus · 2023Article
- Article
- "Early Elective" rather than "Emergency" Laparoscopic Transcystic Exploration can prevent bile duct exploration/ERCP in half of patients.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019Article
- Success of intraoperative imaging and management of suspected choledocholithiasis without pre-operative bile duct imaging - A case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2018Article
- Risk factors and consequences of conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Temporary CBD Stenting with a Nelaton Tube Is a More Practical and Safer Option Than T-Tube Drainage after Conventional CBD Exploration for Choledocholithiasis.HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery · 2018Article
- Spontaneously removed biliary stent drainage versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Medicine · 2016Observational
- Ten-year experience on common bile duct exploration without T-tube insertion.Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2013Article
- Transcystic approach to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- Laparoscopic transcystic choledochotomy with primary suture for choledocholith.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a cost effective, efficient and minimally invasive method of treating choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic Surgery for common bile duct stones (CBDS) was first described in 1991, Petelin (Surg Endosc 17:1705-1715, 2003). The surgical technique has evolved since then and several studies have concluded that Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LCBDE) procedures are superior to sequential endolaparoscopic treatment in terms of both clinical and economical outcomes, Cuschieri et al. (Surg Endosc 13:952-957, 1999), Rhodes et al. (Lancet 351:159-161, 1998). We started doing LCBDE in 1998.Our experience with LCBDE from 1998 to 2004 has been published, Gupta and Bhartia (Indian J Surg 67:94-99, 2005). Here we present our series from January 2005 to March 2009. In a retrospective study from January 2005 to March 2009, we performed 3060 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, out of which 342 patients underwent intraoperative cholangiogram and 158 patients eventually had CBD exploration. 6 patients were converted to open due to presence of multiple stones and 2 patients were converted because of difficulty in defining Calots triangle; 42 patients underwent transcystic clearance, 106 patients had choledochotomy, 20 patients had primary closure of CBD whereas in 86 patients CBD was closed over T-tube; 2 patients had incomplete stone clearance and underwent postoperative ERCP. Choledochoduodenosotomy was done in 2 patients. Patients were followed regularly at six monthly intervals with a range of six months to three years of follow-up. There were no major complications like bile leak or pancreatitis. 8 patients had port-site minor infection which settled with conservative treatment. There were no cases of retained stones or intraabdominal infection. The mean length of hospital stay was 3 days (range 2-8 days). LCBDE remains an efficient, safe, cost-effective method of treating CBDS. Primary closure of choledochotomy in select patients is a viable & safe option with shorter operative time and length of stay. LCBDE can be performed successfully with minimal morbidity & mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.