Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21966075›Full record

Trial reportSleep2011

Efficacy and safety of doxepin 3 and 6 mg in a 35-day sleep laboratory trial in adults with chronic primary insomnia.

Andrew D Krystal, Alan Lankford, H Heith Durrence, Elizabeth Ludington, Philip Jochelson, Roberta Rogowski, Thomas Roth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antidepressants for insomnia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Pharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Insomnia in Adults: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2017
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Insomnia.JAMA · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Sleep and Headache Disorders: What a Clinician Needs to Know.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The Pathogenesis and Treatment of Insomnia Combined with Depression.International journal of general medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Connecting insufficient sleep and insomnia with metabolic dysfunction.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew D KrystalDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA. kryst001@mc.duke.edu
Alan Lankford
H Heith Durrence
Elizabeth Ludington
Philip Jochelson
Roberta Rogowski
Thomas Roth
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxepin (DXP) 3 mg and 6 mg in adults diagnosed with primary insomnia. DESIGN AND

methodsThe study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Patients meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for primary insomnia were randomized to 35 days of nightly treatment with DXP 3 mg (n=75), DXP 6 mg (n=73), or placebo (PBO; n=73), followed by 2 nights of single-blind PBO to evaluate discontinuation (DC) effects. Efficacy was assessed using polysomnography (PSG) and patient reports. Efficacy data were examined for Night (N) 1, N15, and N29. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the study.

resultsCompared with PBO, DXP 3 and 6 mg significantly improved wake time after sleep onset (WASO) on N1 (3 mg and 6 mg; P<0.0001), N15 (3 mg P=0.0025; 6 mg P=0.0009), and N29 (3 mg P=0.0248; 6 mg P=0.0009), latency to persistent sleep (LPS) on N1 (3 mg P=0.0047; 6 mg P=0.0007), and total sleep time (TST) on N1 (3 mg and 6 mg P<0.0001), N15 (6 mg P=0.0035), and N29 (3 mg P=0.0261; 6 mg P<0.0001). In terms of early morning awakenings, DXP 3 and 6 mg demonstrated significant improvements in SE in the final quarter of the night on N1, N15, and N29, with the exception of 3 mg on N29 (P=0.0691). Rates of discontinuation were low, and the safety profiles were comparable across the 3 treatment groups. There were no significant next-day residual effects, and there were no spontaneous reports of memory impairment, complex sleep behaviors, anticholinergic effects, weight gain, or increased appetite. Additionally, there was no evidence of rebound insomnia after DXP discontinuation.

conclusionsFive weeks of nightly administration of DXP 3 mg and 6 mg to adults with chronic primary insomnia resulted in significant and sustained improvements in sleep maintenance and early morning awakenings (with the exception of SE in the final quarter of the night on N29 for 3 mg [P=0.0691]). These sleep improvements were not accompanied by next-day residual effects or followed by rebound insomnia or withdrawal effects upon discontinuation. These findings confirm the unique profile of sleep maintenance efficacy and safety of DXP observed in prior studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodDoxepinFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographySleepSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDoxepinHypnotics and SedativesChronic insomniadoxepinearly morning awakeningssleep maintenance insomniaTSTWASOWTDS

Identifiers

PMID21966075
PMCPMC3174845
OpenAlexW2081272758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.