Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21964996›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2011

Non-linear mixed effects modeling of antiretroviral drug response after administration of lopinavir, atazanavir and efavirenz containing regimens to treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients.

Daniel Röshammar, Ulrika S H Simonsson, Håkan Ekvall, Leo Flamholc, Vidar Ormaasen, Jan Vesterbacka, Eva Wallmark, Michael Ashton, Magnus Gisslén

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Model based design and analysis of phase II HIV-1 trials.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel RöshammarDepartment of Pharmacology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. daniel.roshammar@astrazeneca.com
Ulrika S H Simonsson
Håkan Ekvall
Leo Flamholc
Vidar Ormaasen
Jan Vesterbacka
Eva Wallmark
Michael Ashton
Magnus Gisslén
University of Gothenburg · SELund University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEOslo University Hospital · NOSundsvall Municipality · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this analysis was to compare three methods of handling HIV-RNA data below the limit of quantification (LOQ) when describing the time-course of antiretroviral drug response using a drug-disease model. Treatment naïve Scandinavian HIV-positive patients (n = 242) were randomized to one of three study arms. Two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were administrated in combination with 400/100 mg lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily, 300/100 mg atazanavir/ritonavir once a day or 600 mg efavirenz once a day. The viral response was monitored at screening, baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24, 48, 96, 120, and 144 weeks after study initiation. Data up to 400 days was fitted using a viral dynamics non-linear mixed effects drug-disease model in NONMEM. HIV-RNA data below LOQ of 50 copies/ml plasma (39%) was omitted, replaced by LOQ/2 or included in the analysis using a likelihood-based method (M3 method). Including data below LOQ using the M3 method substantially improved the model fit. The drug response parameter expressing the fractional inhibition of viral replication was on average (95% CI) estimated to 0.787 (0.721-0.864) for lopinavir and atazanavir treatment arms and 0.868 (0.796-0.923) for the efavirenz containing regimen. At 400 days after treatment initiation 90% (76-100) of the lopinavir and atazanavir treated patients were predicted to have undetectable viral levels and 96% (89-100%) for the efavirenz containing treatment. Including viral data below the LOQ rather than omitting or replacing data provides advantages such as better model predictions and less biased parameter estimates which are of importance when quantifying antiretroviral drug response.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsAdultAgedAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsAtazanavir SulfateBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansLimit of DetectionAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsAtazanavir SulfateBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesDrug CombinationsefavirenzLopinavirlopinavir-ritonavir drug combinationOligopeptidesPyridinesRitonavirRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID21964996
OpenAlexW2021430256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.