ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012
Surveillance of suspected adverse reactions to herbal products used as laxatives.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anthraquinone laxatives use and colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Phytotherapy research : PTR · 2022Pooled it
- The Power of Licorice (Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Apoptosis Exerts a Vital Role in the Treatment of Colitis-Associated Cancer by Herbal Medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Article
- Adverse Events to Food Supplements Containing Red Yeast Rice: Comparative Analysis of FAERS and CAERS Reporting Systems.Drug safety · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo describe and evaluate spontaneous reports of suspected adverse reactions (ARs) associated with herbal laxatives received by the Italian Medicines Agency and the Italian National Institute of Health between April 2002 and January 2011.
methodsSpontaneous reports of suspected ARs were individually analyzed by a multidisciplinary group of experts, and a causality assessment was performed.
resultsTwenty-six reactions were reported during the study period. Of these, eight were associated with herbal medicinal products and 18 were related to herbal food supplements. Almost 80% of the reports on ARs involved women. The ARs, classified by System Organ Class, were associated with gastrointestinal, skin and subcutaneous tissue, and hepatobiliary disorders. Fifty percent of the reactions were serious, with the patients requiring hospitalization; of these, one was life-threatening. Most of the herbal remedies associated with the reported ARs contained liquorice, dandelion, and/or plants containing anthraquinones. Possible causes of the ARs were long-term use, idiosyncratic reactions or hypersensitivity, and interaction with other treatments. All of these factors and the presence of a large number of components in the same product increased the unpredictability of the final effect.
conclusionsThe total number of 26 ARs recorded in 8 years is limited; however, the an under-reporting effect cannot be excluded. Moreover, taking into account the seriousness of the reported ARs, the low number of reports does not represent a guarantee of safety. To reduce the risk of an adverse outcome, herbal laxatives should be used only over the short term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.