Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21964766›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2012

Regression of melanoma metastases after immunotherapy is associated with activation of antigen presentation and interferon-mediated rejection genes.

Rafael Carretero, Ena Wang, Ana I Rodriguez, Jennifer Reinboth, Maria L Ascierto, Alyson M Engle, Hui Liu, Francisco M Camacho, Francesco M Marincola, Federico Garrido and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. MHC-I-Driven Antitumor Immunity Counterbalances Low Absorbed Doses of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The Immunogenetics of Melanoma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Rejection versus escape: the tumor MHC dilemma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rafael CarreteroDepartamento de Bioquímica, Biología Molecular III e Inmunología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Ena Wang
Ana I Rodriguez
Jennifer Reinboth
Maria L Ascierto
Alyson M Engle
Hui Liu
Francisco M Camacho
Francesco M Marincola
Federico Garrido
Teresa Cabrera
National Institutes of Health · USHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESUniversidad de Granada · ESFleet Science Center · USHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ES

Funding

Immunogenetic Study of Infectious Diseases and CancerZ01CL002118 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2007 to 2008
$1.4M
Immunogenetic Study of Infectious Diseases and CancerZIACL002118 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2009 to 2012
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CL002118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the results of a comparative gene expression analysis of 15 metastases (10 regressing and 5 progressing) obtained from 2 melanoma patients with mixed response following different forms of immunotherapy. Whole genome transcriptional analysis clearly indicate that regression of melanoma metastases is due to an acute immune rejection mediated by the upregulation of genes involved in antigen presentation and interferon mediated response (STAT-1/IRF-1) in all the regressing metastases from both patients. In contrast, progressing metastases showed low transcription levels of genes involved in these pathways. Histological analysis showed T cells and HLA-DR positive infiltrating cells in the regressing but not in the progressing metastases. Quantitative expression analysis of HLA-A,B and C genes on microdisected tumoral regions indicate higher HLA expression in regressing than in progressing metastases. The molecular signature obtained in melanoma rejection appeared to be similar to that observed in other forms of immune-mediated tissue-specific rejection such as allograft, pathogen clearance, graft versus host or autoimmune disease, supporting the immunological constant of rejection. We favor the idea that the major factor determining the success or failure of immunotherapy is the nature of HLA Class I alterations in tumor cells and not the type of immunotherapy used. If the molecular alteration is reversible by the immunotherapy, the HLA expression will be upregulated and the lesion will be recognized and rejected. In contrast, if the defect is structural the MHC Class I expression will remain unchanged and the lesion will progress.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoplasm MetastasisAntigen PresentationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHLA-A AntigensHLA-B AntigensHLA-C AntigensHLA-DR AntigensHumansInterferon Regulatory Factor-1MelanomaSTAT1 Transcription FactorT-LymphocytesTranscriptional ActivationTranscription, GeneticHLA-A AntigensHLA-B AntigensHLA-C AntigensHLA-DR AntigensInterferon Regulatory Factor-1STAT1 protein, humanSTAT1 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID21964766
PMCPMC3504975
OpenAlexW2058126719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.