Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21964552›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2012

Beyond arousal and valence: the importance of the biological versus social relevance of emotional stimuli.

Michiko Sakaki, Kazuhisa Niki, Mara Mather

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The multifaceted abstract brain.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michiko SakakiUniversity of Southern California, 3715 McClintock Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. msakaki@usc.edu
Kazuhisa Niki
Mara Mather
University of Southern California · USNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JP

Funding

The Impact of Emotional Regulation on Cognition in AgingR01AG025340 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2004 to 2021
$7.9M
Brain Mechanisms of Emotion-Cognition Interactions in AgingK02AG032309 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2009 to 2013
$540k
NIA NIH HHS K02 AG032309NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025340NIA NIH HHS R01AG025340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study addressed the hypothesis that emotional stimuli relevant to survival or reproduction (biologically emotional stimuli) automatically affect cognitive processing (e.g., attention, memory), while those relevant to social life (socially emotional stimuli) require elaborative processing to modulate attention and memory. Results of our behavioral studies showed that (1) biologically emotional images hold attention more strongly than do socially emotional images, (2) memory for biologically emotional images was enhanced even with limited cognitive resources, but (3) memory for socially emotional images was enhanced only when people had sufficient cognitive resources at encoding. Neither images' subjective arousal nor their valence modulated these patterns. A subsequent functional magnetic resonance imaging study revealed that biologically emotional images induced stronger activity in the visual cortex and greater functional connectivity between the amygdala and visual cortex than did socially emotional images. These results suggest that the interconnection between the amygdala and visual cortex supports enhanced attention allocation to biological stimuli. In contrast, socially emotional images evoked greater activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and yielded stronger functional connectivity between the amygdala and MPFC than did biological images. Thus, it appears that emotional processing of social stimuli involves elaborative processing requiring frontal lobe activity.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAttentionBrainBrain MappingEmotionsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryNeural PathwaysOxygen

Identifiers

PMID21964552
PMCPMC3306241
OpenAlexW2136159006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.