Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21963672›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2011

The PPAR alpha agonist gemfibrozil is an ineffective treatment for spinal cord injured mice.

Akshata Almad, A Todd Lash, Ping Wei, Amy E Lovett-Racke, Dana M McTigue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Macrophage Transcriptional Profile Identifies Lipid Catabolic Pathways That Can Be Therapeutically Targeted after Spinal Cord Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akshata AlmadDepartment of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
A Todd Lash
Ping Wei
Amy E Lovett-Racke
Dana M McTigue
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Ohio State Neuroscience Centr CoreP30NS045758 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OBRIETAN, KARL H · 2004 to 2015
$7.7M
Oligodendrocyte Genesis after Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS059776 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCTIGUE, DANA M · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Oligodendrocyte Progenitors in Spinal Cord Injury RepairR01NS043494 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCTIGUE, DANA M · 2003 to 2006
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS NS059776NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS045758NINDS NIH HHS P30-NS045758NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS043494NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor (PPAR)-α is a key regulator of lipid metabolism and recent studies reveal it also regulates inflammation in several different disease models. Gemfibrozil, an agonist of PPAR-α, is a FDA approved drug for hyperlipidemia and has been shown to inhibit clinical signs in a rodent model of multiple sclerosis. Since many studies have shown improved outcome from spinal cord injury (SCI) by anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective agents, we tested the efficacy of oral gemfibrozil given before or after SCI for promoting tissue preservation and behavioral recovery after spinal contusion injury in mice. Unfortunately, the results were contrary to our hypothesis; in our first attempt, gemfibrozil treatment exacerbated locomotor deficits and increased tissue pathology after SCI. In subsequent experiments, the behavioral effects were not replicated but histological outcomes again were worse. We also tested the efficacy of a different PPAR-α agonist, fenofibrate, which also modulates immune responses and is beneficial in several neurodegenerative disease models. Fenofibrate treatment did not improve recovery, although there was a slight trend for a modest increase in histological tissue sparing. Based on our results, we conclude that PPAR-α agonists yield either no effect or worsen recovery from spinal cord injury, at least at the doses and the time points of drug delivery tested here. Further, patients sustaining spinal cord injury while taking gemfibrozil might be prone to exacerbated tissue damage.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFenofibrateGemfibrozilHypolipidemic AgentsMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotor ActivityMyelitisNerve Fibers, MyelinatedPPAR alphaRecovery of FunctionSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesFenofibrateGemfibrozilHypolipidemic AgentsPPAR alpha

Identifiers

PMID21963672
PMCPMC5518476
OpenAlexW2057923161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.