ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2011
Microfluidic devices: useful tools for bioprocess intensification.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tailored micromixing in chemically patterned microchannels undergoing electromagnetohydrodynamic flow.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Article
- Marine Bioprospecting, Biocatalysis and Process Development.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Biocatalysis in Continuous-Flow Microfluidic Reactors.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022Article
- 3D printed ceramics as solid supports for enzyme immobilization: an automated DoE approach for applications in continuous flow.Journal of flow chemistry · 2021Article
- Development of a Microfluidic Platform for R-Phycoerythrin Purification Using an Aqueous Micellar Two-Phase System.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2020Article
- Tuning Surface Morphology of Fluorescent Hydrogels Using a Vortex Fluidic Device.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Beyond the bulk: disclosing the life of single microbial cells.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2017Review
- Study of flow behaviors of droplet merging and splitting in microchannels using Micro-PIV measurement.Microfluidics and nanofluidics · 2017Article
- Cascading and Parallelising Curvilinear Inertial Focusing Systems for High Volume, Wide Size Distribution, Separation and Concentration of Particles.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Quantification of the oxygen uptake rate in a dissolved oxygen controlled oscillating jet-driven microbioreactor.Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire : 1986) · 2016Article
- Synthesis and Application of Amine Functionalized Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Menaquinone-7 Fermentation: A Step towards Process Intensification.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- Flow synthesis of phenylserine using threonine aldolase immobilized on Eupergit support.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dawn of the new millennium saw a trend towards the dedicated use of microfluidic devices for process intensification in biotechnology. As the last decade went by, it became evident that this pattern was not a short-lived fad, since the deliverables related to this field of research have been consistently piling-up. The application of process intensification in biotechnology is therefore seemingly catching up with the trend already observed in the chemical engineering area, where the use of microfluidic devices has already been upgraded to production scale. The goal of the present work is therefore to provide an updated overview of the developments centered on the use of microfluidic devices for process intensification in biotechnology. Within such scope, particular focus will be given to different designs, configurations and modes of operation of microreactors, but reference to similar features regarding microfluidic devices in downstream processing will not be overlooked. Engineering considerations and fluid dynamics issues, namely related to the characterization of flow in microchannels, promotion of micromixing and predictive tools, will also be addressed, as well as reflection on the analytics required to take full advantage of the possibilities provided by microfluidic devices in process intensification. Strategies developed to ease the implementation of experimental set-ups anchored in the use of microfluidic devices will be briefly tackled. Finally, realistic considerations on the current advantages and limitation on the use of microfluidic devices for process intensification, as well as prospective near future developments in the field, will be presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.