Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21962918›Full record

ArticleCell stem cell2011

Direct lineage conversion of terminally differentiated hepatocytes to functional neurons.

Samuele Marro, Zhiping P Pang, Nan Yang, Miao-Chih Tsai, Kun Qu, Howard Y Chang, Thomas C Südhof, Marius Wernig

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stem cell, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 202 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
202citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

202 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 338 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Current Development of iPSC-Based Modeling in Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Insights and applications of direct neuronal reprogramming.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

142 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuele MarroInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine and Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA.
Zhiping P Pang
Nan Yang
Miao-Chih Tsai
Kun Qu
Howard Y Chang
Thomas C Südhof
Marius Wernig
Stanford University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · US

Funding

Induced neuronal cells: A novel tool to study neuropsychiatric diseasesR01MH092931 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas C. Sudhof, Marius Wernig · 2010 to 2026
$9.7M
Dissecting the mechanism of direct neural induction through genomic interrogationRC4NS073015 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, HOWARD Y, QUAKE, STEPHEN R · 2010 to 2010
$2.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092931NIMH NIH HHS R01MH092931-01NINDS NIH HHS RC4 NS073015NINDS NIH HHS RC4NS073015-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several recent studies have showed that mouse and human fibroblasts can be directly reprogrammed into induced neuronal (iN) cells, bypassing a pluripotent intermediate state. However, fibroblasts represent heterogeneous mesenchymal progenitor cells that potentially contain neural crest lineages, and the cell of origin remained undefined. This raises the fundamental question of whether lineage reprogramming is possible between cell types derived from different germ layers. Here, we demonstrate that terminally differentiated hepatocytes can be directly converted into functional iN cells. Importantly, single-cell and genome-wide expression analyses showed that fibroblast- and hepatocyte-derived iN cells not only induced a neuronal transcriptional program, but also silenced their donor transcriptome. The remaining donor signature decreased over time and could not support functional hepatocyte properties. Thus, the reprogramming factors lead to a binary lineage switch decision rather than an induction of hybrid phenotypes, but iN cells retain a small but detectable epigenetic memory of their donor cells.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineageAlbuminsAnimalsCellular ReprogrammingEmbryo, MammalianFibroblastsGene Expression RegulationHepatocytesHumansKineticsLiverMiceMolecular Sequence DataNeuronsOrgan SpecificityAlbumins

Identifiers

PMID21962918
PMCPMC3218088
OpenAlexW2028306551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.