Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21961600›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

Contribution of unfolding and intermolecular architecture to fibronectin fiber extensibility.

Mark J Bradshaw, Michael L Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanical Deformation Accelerates Protein Ageing.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Heparin-dependent regulation of fibronectin matrix conformation.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark J BradshawDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael L Smith
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular matrix contains components with remarkable mechanical properties, including fibronectin (Fn) fibers with extensibilities of >700% strain. We utilized what we consider a novel technique to quantify the extent of molecular unfolding that contributes to Fn fiber extension, and we compared this behavior with stochastic models of Fn fibers with different molecular arrangements. In vitro unfolding as a function of strain was measured by fluorescently labeling cysteines in modules FnIII7 and III15 in artificial Fn fibers. A calibration technique we also consider novel made it possible to demonstrate that 44% of cysteines in these modules were exposed in Fn fibers strained to 421% extension, up from 8% exposure without strain. In silico unfolding was measured by applying a constant strain rate to a fiber represented by a network of wormlike chain springs, each representing an individual Fn molecule. Unfolding rates were calculated with a tension-dependent stochastic model applied to FnIII modules in each molecule. A comparison of these approaches revealed that only a molecular arrangement permitting unequal mechanical loading of Fn molecules recapitulates in vitro unfolding. These data have implications for Fn-dependent mechanotransduction and give insight into how the molecular architecture of natural materials permits such remarkable extensibility.

Indexed as

Protein UnfoldingComputational BiologyCysteineFibronectinsHumansMonte Carlo MethodSpectrometry, FluorescenceCysteineFibronectins

Identifiers

PMID21961600
PMCPMC3183754
OpenAlexW1975150321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.