ArticleBiophysical journal2011
A dynamic model of transcriptional imprinting derived from the vitellogenesis memory effect.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Computational Model of the Rainbow Trout Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Ovary-Liver Axis.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Cloning of multiple ERα mRNA variants in killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus), and differential expression by tissue type, stage of reproduction, and estrogen exposure in fish from polluted and unpolluted environments.Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2015Article
- Epigenetic memories: structural marks or active circuits?Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcriptional memory of transient signals can be imprinted on living systems and influence their reactivity to repeated stimulations. Although they are classically ascribed to structural chromatin rearrangements in eukaryotes, such behaviors can also rely on dynamic memory circuits with sustained self-amplification loops. However, these phenomena are either of finite duration, or conversely associated to sustained phenotypic changes. A mechanism is proposed, in which only the responsiveness of the target gene is durably reset at a higher level after primary stimulation, using the celebrated but still puzzling vitellogenesis memory effect. The basic ingredients of this system are: 1), a positive autoregulation of the estrogen receptor α gene; 2), a strongly cooperative action of the estradiol receptor on vitellogenin expression; and 3), a variant isoform of the estradiol receptor with two autonomous transcription-activating modules, one of which is signal-independent and the other, signal-dependent. Realistic quantification supports the possibility of a multistationary situation in which ligand-independent activity is unable by itself to prime the amplification loop, but can click the system over a memory threshold after a primary stimulation. This ratchet transcriptional mechanism can have developmental and ecotoxicological importance and explain lifelong imprinting of past exposures without apparent phenotypic changes before restimulation and without need for persistent chromatin modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.