Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21960418›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2012

Prognostic utility of T-wave alternans in a real-world population of patients with left ventricular dysfunction: the PREVENT-SCD study.

Satoshi Shizuta, Kenji Ando, Masakiyo Nobuyoshi, Takanori Ikeda, Hideaki Yoshino, Shinichi Hiramatsu, Yukio Kazatani, Kohei Yamashiro, Katsunori Okajima, Teishi Kajiya and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Microvolt T-wave alternans. Ischemic vs. nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Prognostic value of microvolt T-wave alternans in a real-world ICD population. Twente ICD Cohort Studie (TICS).Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2014
    Article
  9. Epicardial ablation cures electrical storm caused by cardiac involvement in myotonic dystrophia type 2.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
  10. Feasibility of T-wave alternans testing in patients considered for a cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi ShizutaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shougoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Kenji Ando
Masakiyo Nobuyoshi
Takanori Ikeda
Hideaki Yoshino
Shinichi Hiramatsu
Yukio Kazatani
Kohei Yamashiro
Katsunori Okajima
Teishi Kajiya
Yoshinori Kobayashi
Takao Kato
Satoki Fujii
Kazuaki Mitsudo
Koichi Inoue
Hiroshi Ito
Yoshisumi Haruna
Takahiro Doi
Yukiko Nishio
Neiko Ozasa
Kei Nishiyama
Toru Kita
Takeshi Morimoto
Takeshi Kimura
PREVENT-SCD Investigators
Kyoto University · JPKurashiki Central Hospital · JPKyorin University · JPEhime Prefectural Central Hospital · JPNippon Medical School · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPSakurabashi Watanabe Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe predictive value of T-wave alternans (TWA) for lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is controversial. Also, long-term arrhythmia risk of patients ineligible for the TWA test is unknown.

methodsThis was a multicenter, prospective observational study of patients with LV ejection fraction ≤40% due to ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, designed to evaluate the prognostic value of TWA for lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The primary end point was a composite of sudden cardiac death, sustained rapid ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), and appropriate defibrillator therapy for rapid VT or VF.

resultsAmong 453 patients enrolled in the study, 280 (62%) were eligible for the TWA test. TWA was negative in 82 patients (29%), who accounted for 18% of the total population. The median of follow-up was 36 months. The 3-year event-free rate for the primary end point was significantly higher in TWA-negative patients (97.0%) than in TWA non-negative patients (89.5%, P = 0.037) and those ineligible for the TWA test (84.4%, P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis identified both non-negative TWA [hazard ratio (HR) 4.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-19.2; P = 0.047) and ineligibility for the TWA test (HR 6.89; 95% CI 1.59-29.9; P = 0.010) to be independent predictors of the primary end point.

conclusionsTWA showed high negative predictive ability for lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with LV dysfunction, although the TWA-negative patients accounted for only 18% of the entire population. Those ineligible for the TWA test had the highest risk for lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Indexed as

Electric CountershockElectrocardiographyAgedChi-Square DistributionDeath, Sudden, CardiacDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID21960418
PMCPMC3268016
OpenAlexW2074409294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.