Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21960180›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2012

Depot naltrexone decreases rewarding properties of sugar in patients with opioid dependence.

Daniel D Langleben, Elliot L Busch, Charles P O'Brien, Igor Elman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. α5GABAPsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Opioid system and human emotions.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Feeding Releases Endogenous Opioids in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel D LanglebenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. langlebe@upenn.edu
Elliot L Busch
Charles P O'Brien
Igor Elman
University of Pennsylvania · USEdith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital · US

Funding

Functional neuromaging of cue-induced heroin cravingK23DA015746 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LANGLEBEN, DANIEL D · 2003 to 2007
$902k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA015746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid neurotransmission mediates hedonic value of sweet tastants; their intake may be exaggerated by the consumption of exogenous opioids (e.g., opioid dependence). Sweet Taste Test (STT) is a validated quantitative instrument assessing taste perception and hedonic features of sugar (sucrose) using a randomized and double-blind administration at five different sucrose concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.83 M.

methodsThe STT and cue-induced craving procedure were administered to opioid-dependent patients (n = 15) before and 1 week after the injection of a long-acting depot naltrexone (XRNT) preparation.

resultsAnalyses of covariance, employing sucrose concentration and its perceived taste as covariates, showed that XRNT therapy significantly reduced the self-reported hedonic and motivational characteristics of sucrose. Greater reductions in both these characteristics were associated with more diminution in the cue-induced opioid craving.

conclusionsOpioid antagonism in opioid-dependent subjects leads to a smaller sweet taste reward, which, in turn, may be proportional to decreased opioid craving. These pilot results support the heuristic value of the STT as a potential marker of the XRNT treatment response and call for further inquiry into potential clinical applications of the test.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAnalysis of VarianceCuesDelayed-Action PreparationsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMotivationNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersPilot ProjectsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousDelayed-Action PreparationsNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsSucrose

Identifiers

PMID21960180
PMCPMC3302938
OpenAlexW1984671097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.