SynthesisImplementation science : IS2011
Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline.
Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions to increase cervical screening uptake among immigrant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening.European journal of cancer care · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the United States.BMC public health · 2014Pooled it
- Screening for new primary cancers in cancer survivors compared to non-cancer controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2013Pooled it
- Opportunities to improve quality of care for cancer survivors in primary care: findings from the BETTER WISE study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Trial
- The role of health education on cervical cancer screening uptake at selected health centers in Addis Ababa.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Trial
- A pilot telephone intervention to increase uptake of breast cancer screening in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2014Trial
- Addressing Cancer Screening Disparities in Little Haiti, Miami, USA: A Literature Review on Barriers and Solutions.Cureus · 2025Review
- Exploring factors associated with preferences for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among racially- and ethnically-diverse women in Minnesota: A cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Implementing organized colorectal cancer screening programs in Europe-protocol for a systematic review of determinants and strategies.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Assessing the use of constructs from the consolidated framework for implementation research in U.S. rural cancer screening promotion programs: a systematic search and scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Developing a co-production strategy to facilitate the adoption and implementation of evidence-based colorectal cancer screening interventions for rural health systems: a pilot study.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Factors Influencing Pap Smear Screening Uptake among Women Visiting Outpatient Clinics in Johor.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2022Article
- The implementation of colorectal cancer screening interventions in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Determinants Associated With Longitudinal Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Analysis of Claims Data.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2021Article
- Systematic reviews as a "lens of evidence": Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening.Journal of medical screening · 2021Review
- Directly Mailing gFOBT Kits to Previous Responders Being Recalled for Colorectal Cancer Screening Increases Participation.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020Article
- A Telephone and Mail Outreach Program Successfully Increases Uptake of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance.Hepatology communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppropriate screening may reduce the mortality and morbidity of colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers. Several high-quality systematic reviews and practice guidelines exist to inform the most effective screening options. However, effective implementation strategies are warranted if the full benefits of screening are to be realized. We developed an implementation guideline to answer the question: What interventions have been shown to increase the uptake of cancer screening by individuals, specifically for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers?
methodsA guideline panel was established as part of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-based Care, and a systematic review of the published literature was conducted. It yielded three foundational systematic reviews and an existing guidance document. We conducted updates of these reviews and searched the literature published between 2004 and 2010. A draft guideline was written that went through two rounds of review. Revisions were made resulting in a final set of guideline recommendations.
resultsSixty-six new studies reflecting 74 comparisons met eligibility criteria. They were generally of poor to moderate quality. Using these and the foundational documents, the panel developed a draft guideline. The draft report was well received in the two rounds of review with mean quality scores above four (on a five-point scale) for each of the items. For most of the interventions considered, there was insufficient evidence to support or refute their effectiveness. However, client reminders, reduction of structural barriers, and provision of provider assessment and feedback were recommended interventions to increase screening for at least two of three cancer sites studied. The final guidelines also provide advice on how the recommendations can be used and future areas for research.
conclusionUsing established guideline development methodologies and the AGREE II as our methodological frameworks, we developed an implementation guideline to advise on interventions to increase the rate of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening. While advancements have been made in these areas of implementation science, more investigations are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.