Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21958494›Full record

Trial reportTrials2011

Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of late onset sepsis in children of less than 90 days of age: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Irja Lutsar, Ursula M T Trafojer, Paul T Heath, Tuuli Metsvaht, Joseph Standing, Susanna Esposito, Vincent Meiffredy de Cabre, Clarissa Oeser, Jean-Pierre Aboulker, NeoMero Consortium

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Use of Antibiotics in Preterm Newborns.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Irja LutsarInstitute of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Estonia. irja.lutsar@ut.ee
Ursula M T Trafojer
Paul T Heath
Tuuli Metsvaht
Joseph Standing
Susanna Esposito
Vincent Meiffredy de Cabre
Clarissa Oeser
Jean-Pierre Aboulker
NeoMero Consortium
Inserm · FRSt George's, University of London · GBFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITTartu University Hospital · EEUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLate onset neonatal sepsis (LOS) with the mortality of 17 to 27% is still a serious disease. Meropenem is an antibiotic with wide antibacterial coverage. The advantage of it over standard of care could be its wider antibacterial coverage and thus the use of mono-instead of combination therapy.

methodsNeoMero-1, an open label, randomised, comparator controlled, superiority trial aims to compare the efficacy of meropenem with a predefined standard of care (ampicillin + gentamicin or cefotaxime + gentamicin) in the treatment of LOS in neonates and infants aged less than 90 days admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit.A total of 550 subjects will be recruited following a 1:1 randomisation scheme. The trial includes patients with culture confirmed (at least one positive culture from normally sterile site except coagulase negative staphylococci in addition to one clinical or laboratory criterion) or clinical sepsis (at least two laboratory and two clinical criteria suggestive of LOS in subjects with postmenstrual age < 44 weeks or fulfilment of criteria established by the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference in subjects with postmenstrual age ≥ 44 weeks). Meropenem will be given at a dose of 20 mg/kg q12h or q8h depending on the gestational- and postnatal age. Comparator agents are administered as indicated in British National Formulary for Children. The primary endpoint measured at the test of cure visit (2 days after end of study therapy) is graded to success (all baseline symptoms and laboratory parameters are resolved or improved with no need to continue antibiotics and the baseline microorganisms are eradicated and no new microorganisms are identified and the patient has received allocated treatment for 11 ± 3 days with no modification) or a failure (all remaining cases). Secondary outcome measures include comparison of survival, relapse rates or new infections by Day 28, clinical response at Day 3 and end of therapy, duration of hospitalisation, population pharmacokinetic analysis of meropenem and effect of antibiotics on mucosal colonisation and development of antibacterial resistance.The study will start recruitment in September 2011; the total duration is of 24 months.

trial registrationEudraCT 2011-001515-31.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLength of StayMeropenemSepsisThienamycinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemThienamycins

Identifiers

PMID21958494
PMCPMC3193806
OpenAlexW2134921732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.