Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21958158›Full record

ArticleACS chemical biology2011

Development and in vitro characterization of a novel bifunctional μ-agonist/δ-antagonist opioid tetrapeptide.

Lauren C Purington, Katarzyna Sobczyk-Kojiro, Irina D Pogozheva, John R Traynor, Henry I Mosberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Intriguing Effects of Substituents in theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Pharmacology of δ-Opioid Receptors.Pharmacological reviews · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CNS active O-linked glycopeptides.Frontiers in chemistry · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren C PuringtonMedical School and College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.
Katarzyna Sobczyk-Kojiro
Irina D Pogozheva
John R Traynor
Henry I Mosberg
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Development of Mixed Function Opioid Peptides and PeptidomimeticsR01DA003910 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MOSBERG, HENRY ISAAC · 1985 to 2017
$9.0M
SUBSTANCE ABUSE INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GNEGY, MARGARET E · 1994 to 2015
$4.5M
OPIOID RECEPTOR MECHANISMSR01DA004087 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TRAYNOR, JOHN R. · 1987 to 2010
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS DA007267NIDA NIH HHS DA03910NIDA NIH HHS DA04087NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003910NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA004087NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of tolerance to and dependence on opioid analgesics greatly reduces their long-term usefulness. Previous studies have demonstrated that co-administration of a μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist and δ-opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist can decrease MOR agonist-induced tolerance and dependence development after chronic exposure. Clinically, a single ligand displaying multiple efficacies (e.g., MOR agonism concurrently with DOR antagonism) would be of increased value over two drugs administered simultaneously. Guided by modeling of receptor-ligand complexes we have developed a series of potent non-selective opioid tetrapeptides that have differing efficacy at MOR and DOR. In particular, our lead peptide (KSK-103) binds with equal affinity to MOR and DOR but acts as a MOR agonist with similar efficacy but greater potency than morphine and a DOR antagonist in cellular assays measuring both G protein stimulation and adenylyl cyclase inhibition.

Indexed as

Adenylyl Cyclase InhibitorsAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsCell LineCHO CellsCricetinaeCross-Linking ReagentsDrug ToleranceGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)HumansModels, MolecularNarcotic AntagonistsOligopeptidesPeptides, CyclicRatsReceptors, Opioid, deltaAdenylyl Cyclase InhibitorsAnalgesics, OpioidCross-Linking ReagentsGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)KSK-103Narcotic AntagonistsOligopeptidesPeptides, CyclicReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID21958158
PMCPMC3241856
OpenAlexW2318926876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.