ReviewHNO2011
[Update on HPV-induced oropharyngeal cancer].
Review in HNO, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- [New aspects of HPV-positive head and neck cancer. Highlights from the 2011 ASCO Congress].HNO · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is associated with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in 30-40% of all cases in Germany. The use of PCR and / or in situ hybridisation to detect HPV in tumour tissue is used in combination with p16 immunohistochemistry to reliably distinguish HPV-related and HPV-unrelated OSCC. The distinct biological behaviour of the HPV-related subset of OSCC results in a more favourable prognosis. This might be the result of a greater response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy as seen in recent studies. Ongoing and future clinical trials will stratify for HPV status. If the results of these prospective, randomized trials are consistent with the preliminary results of recent studies, HPV status will be of enormous clinical relevance in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.