ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2012
[Diagnosis of osteoporosis in geriatric patients - possibilities and limitations].
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional status and depressive symptoms in relation to bone mineral density and osteoporosis in hospitalized older adults: a cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- [Osteoporosis and multimorbidity].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2019Review
- [Management of osteoporosis after fragility fractures].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2018Review
- [Osteoporosis: therapy in interface management].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis with its increased risk of low-trauma fractures has to be regarded as a disorder with significant influence on quality of life, increased morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Therapies of osteoporosis, in particular drug therapies aiming to reduce the fracture risk, are in general only initiated after diagnostic procedures prior to the start of osteoporosis therapy. Consequently, diagnosis of osteoporosis plays a key role in optimized patient care and management. Medical history, physical examination, planar X-ray, osteodensitometry and a range of laboratory parameters make up the key steps in the diagnostic work up of osteoporosis. In some clinical settings such as the investigation of possible occult fractures after falls, additional imaging methods including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scintigraphy may be necessary to make up adequate diagnosis. However, it has to be questioned in which way all these diagnostic investigations can be effectively used in the diagnostic work up of geriatric patients. The article will give an overview of the different diagnostic methods with their possibilities and limitations and will present possible diagnostic work flows based on frequent clinical settings seen in geriatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.