ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2012
Analysis of clinical interventional strategy for women with urinary incontinence complicated with diabetes mellitus.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship Between Blood Glucose Level and Prevalence and Frequency of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women.Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2022Article
- Gestational diabetes is associated with alteration on pelvic floor muscle activation pattern during pregnancy and postpartum: Prospective cohort using electromyography assessment.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Glycaemic control and risk of incident urinary incontinence in women with Type 1 diabetes: results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2016Observational
- Diabetes, Glycemic Control, and Urinary Incontinence in Women.Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis study aims to investigate clinical therapeutic measures for women with urinary incontinence (UI) complicated with diabetes mellitus (DM).
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study, including 462 female patients with UI complicated with DM (group A) and 901 patients with UI without DM (group B). Both A and B groups were divided into three subgroups according to their UI types (pure stress UI, mixed UI dominated by urge UI, and by overactive bladder syndrome) and received corresponding treatments. The subjective and objective effective rates were analyzed statistically.
resultsThe overall subjective effective rates were 62.99% and 85.23% and the overall objective effective rates were 67.53% and 87.24% for groups A and groups B, respectively; the subjective and objective effective rates were 73.68% and 89.47% for group A1 (patients with pure stress UI in group A). There was no statistical difference in group A1 between subjective and objective effective rates.
conclusionUnsatisfactory clinical therapeutic efficacy was observed in women with UI complicated with DM; surgical operation should be deliberated cautiously for women with SUI complicated with DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.