Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21955930›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2011

Randomized controlled trial of mailed Nicotine Replacement Therapy to Canadian smokers: study protocol.

John A Cunningham, Scott T Leatherdale, Peter L Selby, Rachel F Tyndale, Laurie Zawertailo, Vladyslav Kushnir

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01429129 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Mailed Nicotine Replacement Therapy to Canadian Smokers), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01429129 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial of Mailed Nicotine Replacement Therapy to Canadian Smokers

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2012 to 2015Enrolled1,000ConditionsSmokingArmsNicotine replacement therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Comparison of smoking prevalence in Canada before and after nicotine vaping product access using the SimSmoke model.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Beyond Quitting: Any Additional Impact of Mailing Free Nicotine Patches to Current Smokers?Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
  8. The Impact of Asking About Interest in Free Nicotine Patches on Smoker's Stated Intent to Change: Real Effect or Artefact of Question Ordering?Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John A CunninghamCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell St, Toronto M5S 2S1, Canada. john_cunningham@camh.net
Scott T Leatherdale
Peter L Selby
Rachel F Tyndale
Laurie Zawertailo
Vladyslav Kushnir
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsiderable public health efforts are ongoing Canada-wide to reduce the prevalence of smoking in the general population. From 1985 to 2005, smoking rates among adults decreased from 35% to 19%, however, since that time, the prevalence has plateaued at around 18-19%. To continue to reduce the number of smokers at the population level, one option has been to translate interventions that have demonstrated clinical efficacy into population level initiatives. Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) has a considerable clinical research base demonstrating its efficacy and safety and thus public health initiatives in Canada and other countries are distributing NRT widely through the mail. However, one important question remains unanswered--do smoking cessation programs that involve mailed distribution of free NRT work? To answer this question, a randomized controlled trial is required. METHODS/

designA single blinded, panel survey design with random assignment to an experimental and a control condition will be used in this study. A two-stage recruitment process will be employed, in the context of a general population survey with two follow-ups (8 weeks and 6 months). Random digit dialing of Canadian home telephone numbers will identify households with adult smokers (aged 18+ years) who are willing to take part in a smoking study that involves three interviews, with saliva collection for 3-HC/cotinine ratio measurement at baseline and saliva cotinine verification at 8-week and 6-month follow-ups (N = 3,000). Eligible subjects interested in free NRT will be determined at baseline (N = 1,000) and subsequently randomized into experimental and control conditions to receive versus not receive nicotine patches. The primary hypothesis is that subjects who receive nicotine patches will display significantly higher quit rates (as assessed by 30 day point prevalence of abstinence from tobacco) at 6-month follow-up as compared to subjects who do not receive nicotine patches at baseline. DISCUSSION: The findings from the proposed trial are timely and highly relevant as mailed distribution of NRT require considerable resources and there are limited public health dollars available to combat this substantial health concern. In addition, findings from this randomized controlled trial will inform the development of models to engage smokers to quit, incorporating proactive recruitment and the offer of evidence based treatment.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01429129.

Indexed as

Postal ServiceSmoking PreventionTobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultCanadaCotinineFollow-Up StudiesHumansPatient SelectionResearch DesignSalivaSingle-Blind MethodSmoking CessationTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCotinine

Identifiers

PMID21955930
PMCPMC3198706
OpenAlexW1989729624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.