Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21955570›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2011

Effect of an audiovisual message for tetanus booster vaccination broadcast in the waiting room.

Caroline Eubelen, Fannette Brendel, Jean-Luc Belche, Anne Freyens, Sophie Vanbelle, Didier Giet

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03239795 (Promoting Influenza Vaccination In General Practice Waiting Rooms By Posters And Pamphlets), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03239795 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Promoting Influenza Vaccination In General Practice Waiting Rooms By Posters And Pamphlets: A Registry Based Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChristophe BerkhoutRan2014 to 2017Enrolled10,597ConditionsHealth Behavior, Vaccination, Influenza, HumanArmsAdvertisement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "I would not go to him": Focus groups exploring community responses to a public health campaign aimed at reducing unnecessary diagnostic imaging of low back pain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effectiveness of health education materials in general practice waiting rooms: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Caroline EubelenCentre de Santé Intégrée des Carrières, rue Vieille Voie de Liège, 1, B-4140 Sprimont, Belgium.
Fannette Brendel
Jean-Luc Belche
Anne Freyens
Sophie Vanbelle
Didier Giet
University of Liège · BEMaastricht University · NLUniversité de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) often lack time and resources to invest in health education; audiovisual messages broadcast in the waiting room may be a useful educational tool. This work was designed to assess the effect of a message inviting patients to ask for a tetanus booster vaccination.

methodsA quasi experimental study was conducted in a Belgian medical practice consisting of 6 GPs and 4 waiting rooms (total: 20,000 contacts/year). A tetanus booster vaccination audiovisual message was continuously broadcast for 6 months in 2 randomly selected waiting rooms (intervention group--3 GPs) while the other 2 waiting rooms remained unequipped (control group--3 GPs). At the end of the 6-month period, the number of vaccine adult-doses delivered by local pharmacies in response to GPs' prescriptions was recorded. As a reference, the same data were also collected retrospectively for the general practice during the same 6-month period of the previous year.

resultsDuring the 6-month reference period where no audiovisual message was broadcast in the 4 waiting rooms, the number of prescriptions presented for tetanus vaccines was respectively 52 (0.44%) in the intervention group and 33 (0.38%) in the control group (p = 0.50). By contrast, during the 6-month study period, the number of prescriptions differed between the two groups (p < 0.0001), rising significantly to 91 (0.79%) in the intervention group (p = 0.0005) while remaining constant in the control group (0.38% vs 0.39%; p = 0.90).

conclusionsBroadcasting an audiovisual health education message in the GPs' waiting room was associated with a significant increase in the number of adult tetanus booster vaccination prescriptions delivered by local pharmacies.

Indexed as

AdultAudiovisual AidsBelgiumCommunity Pharmacy ServicesDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineDiphtheria-Tetanus VaccineGeneral PracticeHumansImmunization, SecondaryPatient Education as TopicProgram EvaluationRural Health ServicesTetanusTetanus ToxoidTime FactorsDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineDiphtheria-Tetanus VaccineTetanus Toxoid

Identifiers

PMID21955570
PMCPMC3196896
OpenAlexW2161476319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.