Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21954477›Full record

ArticleJAMA2011

Operator experience and carotid stenting outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries.

Brahmajee K Nallamothu, Hitinder S Gurm, Henry H Ting, Philip P Goodney, Mary A M Rogers, Jeptha P Curtis, Justin B Dimick, Eric R Bates, Harlan M Krumholz, John D Birkmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Carotid Revascularization: Current Practice and Future Directions.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Risk-Benefit Assessment of Carotid Revascularization.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brahmajee K NallamothuCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. bnallamo@umich.edu
Hitinder S Gurm
Henry H Ting
Philip P Goodney
Mary A M Rogers
Jeptha P Curtis
Justin B Dimick
Eric R Bates
Harlan M Krumholz
John D Birkmeyer

Funding

Understanding Variation in Treatment Intensity with Lower Extremity PADK08HL105676 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GOODNEY, PHILIP P · 2010 to 2014
$700k
Carotid angioplasty and stenting in the elderlyR21AG032155 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NALLAMOTHU, BRAHMAJEE K · 2008 to 2009
$348k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL105676NIA NIH HHS 5R21AG032155-02NIA NIH HHS R21 AG032155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAlthough the efficacy of carotid stenting has been established in clinical trials, outcomes of the procedure based on operator experience are less certain in clinical practice.

objectiveTo assess association between outcomes and 2 measures of operator experience: annual volume and experience at the time of the procedure among new operators who first performed carotid stenting after a national coverage decision by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Observational study using administrative data on fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older undergoing carotid stenting between 2005 and 2007.

main outcome measureThirty-day mortality stratified by very low, low, medium, and high annual operator volumes (<6, 6-11, 12-23, and ≥24 procedures per year, respectively) and treatment early vs late during a new operator's experience (1st to 11th procedure and 12th procedure or higher).

resultsDuring the study period, 24,701 procedures were performed by 2339 operators. Of these, 11,846 were performed by 1792 new operators who first performed carotid stenting after the CMS national coverage decision. Overall, 30-day mortality was 1.9% (n = 461) and rate of failure to use an embolic protection device was 4.8% (n = 1173). The median annual operator volume among Medicare beneficiaries was 3.0 per year (interquartile range, 1.4-6.5) and 11.6% of operators performed 12 or more procedures per year during the study period. Observed 30-day mortality was higher among patients treated by operators with lower annual volumes (2.5% [95% CI, 2.1%-2.9%], 1.9% [95% CI, 1.6%-2.3%], 1.6% [95% CI, 1.3%-1.9%], and 1.4% [95% CI, 1.1%-1.7%] across the 4 categories; P < .001) and among patients treated early (2.3%; 95% CI, 2.0%-2.7%) vs late (1.4%; 95% CI, 1.1%-1.9%; P < .001) during a new operator's experience. After multivariable adjustment, patients treated by very low-volume operators had a higher risk of 30-day mortality compared with patients treated by high-volume operators (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.7; P < .001). Similarly, we found a higher risk of 30-day mortality in patients treated early vs late during a new operator's experience (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P = .001).

conclusionAmong older patients undergoing carotid stenting, lower annual operator volume and early experience are associated with increased 30-day mortality.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAtherosclerosisCarotid StenosisCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Fee-for-Service PlansFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInsurance CoverageMaleMedicarePhysiciansQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID21954477
PMCPMC3208144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.