Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21954161›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

Dynamics of homology searching during gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by donor competition.

Eric Coïc, Joshua Martin, Taehyun Ryu, Sue Yen Tay, Jané Kondev, James E Haber

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mutations and structural variants arising during double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. DNA Repair: The Search for Homology.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chromosome position determines the success of double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanisms and principles of homology search during recombination.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric CoïcDepartment of Biology and Rosenstiel Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254-9110, USA.
Joshua Martin
Taehyun Ryu
Sue Yen Tay
Jané Kondev
James E Haber
Brandeis University · USCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

Recombination Mechanisms in Yeast Cell DifferentiationR37GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 2007 to 2016
$5.5M
RECOMBINATION MECHANISMS IN YEAST CELL DIFFERENTIATIONR01GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 1985 to 2006
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM20056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM020056NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM020056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the least understood aspects of homologous recombination is the process by which the ends of a double-strand break (DSB) search the entire genome for homologous templates that can be used to repair the break. We took advantage of the natural competition between the alternative donors HML and HMR employed during HO endonuclease-induced switching of the budding yeast MAT locus. The strong mating-type-dependent bias in the choice of the donors is enforced by the recombination enhancer (RE), which lies 17 kb proximal to HML. We investigated factors that improve the use of the disfavored donor. We show that the normal heterochromatic state of the donors does not impair donor usage, as donor choice is not affected by removing this epigenetic silencing. In contrast, increasing the length of homology shared by the disfavored donor increases its use. This result shows that donor choice is not irrevocable and implies that there are several encounters between the DSB ends and even the favored donor before recombination is accomplished. The increase by adding more homology is not linear; these results can be explained by a thermodynamic model that determines the energy cost of using one donor over the other. An important inference from this analysis is that when HML is favored as the donor, RE causes a reduction in its effective genomic distance from MAT from 200 kb to ∼20 kb, which we hypothesize occurs after the DSB is created, by epigenetic chromatin modifications around MAT.

Indexed as

Gene ConversionGenes, FungalGene SilencingRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID21954161
PMCPMC3241425
OpenAlexW2139292007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.