ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2012
Drug-induced sleep: theoretical and practical considerations.
Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of K₂p channels in anaesthesia and sleep.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2015Review
- Sites of action of sleep and wake drugs: insights from model organisms.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faithful replication of normal sleep through medications--can it be achieved? Departure from normal sleep with the use of drugs--when is it desired? Answers to these questions depend on accurate understanding of sleep and on concrete criteria upon which to define it. Since these elements are evolving sciences, as yet incompletely known, one might take a nihilistic approach that we simply cannot judge whether we have successfully replicated sleep, since we do not fully grasp what sleep is or what it does. To address these potential obstacles, our article is written in two sections. The first addresses theoretical considerations for how medications might be seen in the larger framework of sleep. The purpose of this section is to inform readers about key issues in evaluating whether a drug has sufficient data to persuasively argue it is re-creating sleep. (We hope that researchers interested in conducting studies, or critical readers of the drug-study literature, might find this section particularly useful.) The second section of this article approaches exemplary, current concepts of pharmacologic manipulation of sleep, organized by disorders as articulated by the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (2005). This second section will combine practical knowledge of clinical sleep medicine, with emphasis on contemporary knowledge about molecular mechanisms that are felt to underlie some of these phenomena. We recognize that our collective knowledge about sleep will advance in the coming years. We hope that this article serves to facilitate that advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21953011What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.