ArticleClinical rheumatology2012
What is the ability of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies determination in synovial fluid in discriminating rheumatoid arthritis from non-rheumatoid arthritis patients? A Tunisian cross-sectional study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) seem to be produced locally at the site of joints inflammation in the first stage of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A strong correlation between serum ACPA and ACPA in the synovial fluid (SF-ACPA) is now suggested. A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of ACPA determination in SF of patients with RA. A total of 53 patients with a knee-joint effusion (26 RA, 18 peripheral spondyloarthropathies (SPA), and 9 osteoarthritis (OA)) were included in our study. SF samples were obtained by performing therapeutic arthrosynthesis. IgG serum ACPA and SF-ACPA levels were determined by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We have also determined IgG levels in serum and SF by nephelometry. Higher levels of IgG ACPA antibodies in SF (p = 0.045) and serum (p = 0.045) were found in patients with RA with respect to SPA and OA patients. The Spearman correlation analysis showed a significant and positive correlation between ACPA in serum and SF (rho = 0.516; p = 0.007) not only in the RA group but also in patients with SPA. Serum ACPA discriminated RA from non-RA at a cut-off value of 2.7 U/ml (sensitivity, 69%; specificity, 78%; and area under the curve (AUC), 0.72), whereas SF-ACPA discriminated RA from non-RA at a higher cut-off value of 4.95 U/ml (sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 61%; and AUC, 0.71). Our study suggests that the determination of SF-ACPA give complement information to serum ACPA in patients with RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.