Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21952952›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2011

Clinical pharmacists and basic scientists: do patients and physicians need this collaboration?

Amir H Zargarzadeh, Susan Jacob, Roger S Klotz, Fadi T Khasawneh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir H Zargarzadeh
Susan Jacob
Roger S Klotz
Fadi T Khasawneh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this commentary is to highlight the vital and beneficial role that pharmacists and inter-professional collaborative practice play in patient care from the economic, humanistic, efficacy, and safety perspectives. Pharmacists, particularly those with an in-depth knowledge of the basic pharmaceutical sciences, recognize the need to collaborate with other healthcare professions and understand the importance of combining all of the components of their education into a well-rounded, comprehensive clinical practice. Indeed, there is ample evidence in the literature that pharmacists equipped with a solid foundation in basic pharmaceutical science, coupled with clinical knowledge and skills can, more effectively, contribute to pharmacotherapy and patient care, particularly in a collaborative practice setting. Consequently, the burden on pharmacy education is to maintain its emphasis on the basic sciences while promoting the application of these sciences in clinical practice, in the Pharm. D. curriculum. This is a goal that can also be achieved through inter-professional educational approaches.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCooperative BehaviorCurriculumEducation, PharmacyHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient CarePharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalPhysiciansProfessional Role

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.