Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21952287›Full record

ReviewCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)

Viral vector-based therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Cecilia Larocca, Jeffrey Schlom

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 214 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Designing nucleic acid-based therapeutics for cancer treatment: Updates on the state of the art.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The theory of tumor immuno-ecodynamics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Natural carrier systems in cancer vaccines and immunotherapy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. A new era of cancer immunotherapy: vaccines and miRNAs.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The progress of tumor vaccines clinical trials in non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cecilia LaroccaHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Research Scholars' Program at the NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jeffrey Schlom
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Strategies for Cancer Vaccine Development: Preclinical StudiesZIABC010944 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHLOM, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2025
$26.6M
Strategies for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine Clinical TrialsZIABC010425 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHLOM, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2023
$13.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteIntramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most viruses are naturally immunogenic and can be engineered to express tumor antigen transgenes. Moreover, many types of recombinant viruses have been shown to infect professional antigen-presenting cells, specifically dendritic cells, and express their transgenes. This enhanced presentation of tumor antigens to the immune system has led to an increase in the frequency and avidity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes that target tumor cells expressing the tumor antigen(s) encoded in the vaccine vector. Logistically, recombinant viruses can be produced, administered, and quality controlled more easily compared with other immunotherapy strategies. The intrinsic properties of each virus have distinct advantages and disadvantages, which can determine their applicability in a particular therapeutic setting. The disadvantage of some vectors is the development of host-induced neutralizing antibodies to the vector itself, thus limiting its continued use. The "off-the-shelf" nature of viral vaccine platforms renders them exceptionally suitable for multicenter randomized trials. This review described and discussed the strategies used and results using viral-based vaccines, with emphasis on phases II and III clinical trials. Future directions will involve the evaluation of viral-based vaccines in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, in patients with low burden metastatic disease, and in combination with other forms of therapy including immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicGenetic VectorsHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsVaccines, DNAViral VaccinesVirusesAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesMVA vaccineVaccines, DNAViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21952287
PMCPMC3207353
OpenAlexW2076096828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.