Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21952285›Full record

ReviewCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)

The present and future of peptide vaccines for cancer: single or multiple, long or short, alone or in combination?

Craig L Slingluff

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Overcoming Drug Resistance by Paclitaxel Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nanotechnology Meets Immunotherapy: Crosstalks Against Cancer.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Engineering Bispecific Peptides for Precision Immunotherapy and Beyond.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Microenvironment-based immunotherapy in oral cancer: a comprehensive review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Craig L SlingluffHuman Immune Therapy Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA. cls8h@virginia.edu
University of Virginia · US

Funding

MELANOMA VACCINES USING MHC-ASSOCIATED PEPTIDESR01CA057653 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 1997 to 2012
$3.4M
MULTI-EPITOPE MELANOMA VACCINES FOR CD4 AND CD8 T-CELLSR01CA104362 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 2005 to 2009
$2.0M
Multi-peptide Vaccine Administered with Cyclophosphamide for High-risk MelanomaR01CA118386 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
VACCINES WITH MHC CLASS II-RESTRICTED MELANOMA PEPTIDESR21CA105777 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 2003 to 2004
$676k
PEPTIDE BASED VACCINES FOR STAGE IV MELANOMAR01CA078519 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 1998 to 2000
$169k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA057653NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078519NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104362NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118386NCI NIH HHS R01 CA57653NCI NIH HHS R21 CA105777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide vaccines incorporate one or more short or long amino acid sequences as tumor antigens, combined with a vaccine adjuvant. Thus, they fall broadly into the category of defined antigen vaccines, along with vaccines using protein, protein subunits, DNA, or RNA. They remain one of the most immunogenic approaches, based on measures of T-cell response in the blood or in draining lymph nodes. However, existing peptide vaccines have had limited success at inducing clinical tumor regressions, despite reliable induction of T-cell responses. Several new developments offer promise for improving peptide vaccines, including use of long peptides, optimization of adjuvants including toll-like receptor agonists, and combination with systemic therapies that may reduce tumor-associated immune dysfunction, such as blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions. To apply these new approaches optimally, it will be critical to study their effects in the context of defined antigens, for which peptide vaccines are optimal.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicB7-H1 AntigenCancer VaccinesCD40 AntigensCD4 AntigensEpitopesHumansPhosphopeptidesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorT-LymphocytesVaccines, SubunitAdjuvants, ImmunologicB7-H1 AntigenCancer VaccinesCD274 protein, humanCD40 AntigensCD4 AntigensEpitopesPDCD1 protein, humanPhosphopeptidesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID21952285
PMCPMC3204371
OpenAlexW1966916002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.