Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21952046›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2011

The complex transcription regulatory landscape of our genome: control in three dimensions.

Erik Splinter, Wouter de Laat

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. 3D genomics and its applications in precision medicine.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2023
    Article
  6. Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Pinning Down the Transcription: A Role for Peptidyl-ProlylFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Long-Range Chromatin Interactions.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erik SplinterHubrecht Insitute-KNAW & University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wouter de Laat
Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-coding part of our genome contains sequence motifs that can control gene transcription over distance. Here, we discuss functional genomics studies that uncover and characterize these sequences across the mammalian genome. The picture emerging is of a genome being a complex regulatory landscape. We explore the principles that underlie the wiring of regulatory DNA sequences and genes. We argue transcriptional control over distance can be understood when considering action in the context of the folded genome. Genome topology is expected to differ between individual cells, and this may cause variegated expression. High-resolution three-dimensional genome topology maps, ultimately of single cells, are required to understand the cis-regulatory networks that underlie cellular transcriptomes.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanAnimalsChromosome MappingGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMammalsModels, BiologicalRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID21952046
PMCPMC3230377
OpenAlexW2159966229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.