ArticleInternational archives of medicine2011
Anteroposterior chest radiograph vs. chest CT scan in early detection of pneumothorax in trauma patients.
Article in International archives of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07018856 (The CLEAR Vanguard Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The CLEAR Vanguard Feasibility Study: Comparative Evaluation of Novice-Performed Lung Ultrasound Versus Chest X-Ray for Pneumothorax Detection Post-Chest Tube Removal in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence as a second reader for pneumothorax detection: redirecting rather than reducing chest CT use.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- An Observational Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound Compared to High-resolution Computed Tomography Scan of Thorax in Patients Admitted with Respiratory Problems to Critical Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Primary spontaneous pneumothorax: reassessing the role of chest CT in surgical decision-making.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- A Practical Approach to Pneumothorax Management.Pulmonary therapy · 2025Article
- Outcomes with multi-disciplinary management of central lung tumors with CT-guided percutaneous high dose rate brachyablation.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pneumothorax is a common complication following blunt chest wall trauma. In these patients, because of the restrictions regarding immobilization of the cervical spine, Anteroposterior (AP) chest radiograph is usually the most feasible initial study which is not as sensitive as the erect chest X-ray or CT chest for detection of a pneumothorax. We will present 3 case reports which serve for better understanding of the entity of occult pneumothorax. The first case is an example of a true occult pneumothorax where an initial AP chest X-ray revealed no evidence of pneumothorax and a CT chest immediately performed revealed evidence of pneumothorax. The second case represents an example of a missed rather than a truly occult pneumothorax where the initial chest radiograph revealed clues suggesting the presence of pneumothorax which were missed by the reading radiologist. The third case emphasizes the fact that "occult pneumothorax is predictable". The presence of subcutaneous emphesema and pulmonary contusion should call for further imaging with CT chest to rule out pneumothorax. Thoracic CT scan is therefore the "gold standard" for early detection of a pneumothorax in trauma patients. This report aims to sensitize readers to the entity of occult pneumothorax and create awareness among intensivists and ER physicians regarding the proper diagnosis and management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.