Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21951341›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2012

Tregs in infection and vaccinology: heroes or traitors?

Luciana Berod, Franz Puttur, Jochen Huehn, Tim Sparwasser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of immune checkpoint molecules on FoxP3BMC infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CD4Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. TargetingFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luciana BerodInstitute for Infection Immunology, TWINCORE, Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, Medical School Hanover-MHH-Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research-HZI, Hanover, Germany.
Franz Puttur
Jochen Huehn
Tim Sparwasser

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of effective vaccines against life-threatening pathogens in human diseases represents one of the biggest challenges in biomedical science. Vaccines traditionally make use of the body's own immune armoury to combat pathogens. Yet, while our immune system is mostly effective in eliminating or controlling a diverse range of microorganisms, its responses are incomplete or somewhat limited in several other cases. How immune responses are restrained during certain infections has been a matter of debate for many years. The discovery of regulatory T cells (Tregs), an immune cell type that plays a central role in maintaining immune homeostasis and controlling appropriate immune responses, has shed light into many questions. Indeed, it has been proposed that while Tregs might be beneficial in preventing excessive tissue damage during infection, they might also favour pathogen persistence by restraining effector immune responses. In addition, Tregs are believed to limit immune responses upon vaccination. Different strategies have been pursued to circumvent Treg activity during immunization, but the lack of specific tools for their study has led sometimes to controversial conclusions. With the advent of novel mouse models that allow specific depletion and/or tracking of Treg populations in vivo, novel aspects of Treg biology during infection have been unravelled. In this review, we describe the new advances in understanding Treg biology during infection and evaluate Treg depletion as a novel adjuvant strategy for vaccination.

Indexed as

Immune ToleranceAnimalsHomeostasisHumansInfectionsLymphocyte DepletionMiceModels, AnimalT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID21951341
PMCPMC3815786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.