ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2011
Multiple scattering model for the penetration depth of low-coherence enhanced backscattering.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rectal Optical Markers for In Vivo Risk Stratification of Premalignant Colorectal Lesions.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015Article
- In vivo risk analysis of pancreatic cancer through optical characterization of duodenal mucosa.Pancreas · 2015Article
- Quantitative monitoring of radiation induced skin toxicities in nude mice using optical biomarkers measured from diffuse optical reflectance spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2014Article
- Buccal spectral markers for lung cancer risk stratification.PloS one · 2014Article
- In vivo quantification of the scattering properties of tissue using multi-diameter single fiber reflectance spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2013Article
- Algorithm for automated selection of application-specific fiber-optic reflectance probes.Journal of biomedical optics · 2013Article
- Goniometric measurements of thick tissue using Monte Carlo simulations to obtain the single scattering anisotropy coefficient.Biomedical optics express · 2012Article
- A fiber optic probe design to measure depth-limited optical properties in-vivo with low-coherence enhanced backscattering (LEBS) spectroscopy.Optics express · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Low-coherence enhanced backscattering (LEBS) is a depth-selective self-interference phenomenon that originates from light traveling time-reversed paths in a scattering medium. The depth selectivity of LEBS and its sensitivity to optical properties of the scattering medium has made it a promising technique for probing the structure of biological tissue with applications to disease diagnosis and, in particular, precancerous conditions. The ability to accurately predict the penetration depth of the LEBS signal is important in targeting an optimal tissue depth for detecting precancerous cells. This prediction is further complicated by the variation in optical properties of different tissue types. In this paper, the effects of the reduced scattering coefficient (μ(s)'), the phase function and the instrument spatial coherence length (L(sc)) on the LEBS penetration depth are quantified. It is determined that the LEBS penetration depth is primarily dependent on L(sc), μ(s)', and the anisotropy factor (g), but has minimal dependence on higher moments of the phase function. An empirical expression, having a similar form as the double scattering approximation for LEBS, is found to accurately predict the average penetration depth in the multiple scattering regime. The expression is shown to be accurate for a broad range of experimentally relevant optical properties and spatial coherence lengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.