Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21950930›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2011

Quantitative photoacoustic imaging: correcting for heterogeneous light fluence distributions using diffuse optical tomography.

Adam Q Bauer, Ralph E Nothdurft, Todd N Erpelding, Lihong V Wang, Joseph P Culver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantitative Optical Imaging of Oxygen in Brain Vasculature.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam Q BauerWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. abauer@hbar.wustl.edu
Ralph E Nothdurft
Todd N Erpelding
Lihong V Wang
Joseph P Culver

Funding

Task Specific Project 3: Diffuse Optical TomographyU54CA136398 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2008 to 2012
$6.0M
RECOVERY OF OPTICAL ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT IN QUANTITATIVE PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGINGR01EB008085 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2008 to 2011
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA136398NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008085NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB008085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specificity of molecular and functional photoacoustic (PA) images depends on the accuracy of the photoacoustic absorption spectroscopy. The PA signal is proportional to the product of the optical absorption coefficient and local light fluence; quantitative PA measurements of the optical absorption coefficient therefore require an accurate estimation of optical fluence. Light-modeling aided by diffuse optical tomography (DOT) can be used to map the required fluence and to reduce errors in traditional PA spectroscopic analysis. As a proof-of-concept, we designed a tissue-mimicking phantom to demonstrate how fluence-related artifacts in PA images can lead to misrepresentations of tissue properties. To correct for these inaccuracies, the internal fluence in the tissue phantom was estimated by using DOT to reconstruct spatial distributions of the absorption and reduced scattering coefficients of multiple targets within the phantom. The derived fluence map, which only consisted of low spatial frequency components, was used to correct PA images of the phantom. Once calibrated to a known absorber, this method reduced errors in estimated absorption coefficients from 33% to 6%. These results experimentally demonstrate that combining DOT with PA imaging can significantly reduce fluence-related errors in PA images, while producing quantitatively accurate, high-resolution images of the optical absorption coefficient.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingPhotoacoustic TechniquesSpectrum AnalysisTomography, Optical

Identifiers

PMID21950930
PMCPMC3188642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.