ArticleLetters in applied microbiology2011
Effect of low-concentration chlorine dioxide gas against bacteria and viruses on a glass surface in wet environments.
Article in Letters in applied microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inactivation of Surface-Associated Viruses in Real Indoor Environments by a Humidification System Generating Vaporized Free Chlorine Components.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-Concentration Gaseous Chlorine Dioxide in Inactivating Airborne H5 High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus in Vivo Model.Food and environmental virology · 2026Article
- Process Technologies for Disinfection of Food-Contact Surfaces in the Dry Food Industry: A Review.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Article
- Antimicrobial effects of chlorine dioxide in a hospital setting.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- The effects of continuous exposure to low-dose chlorine dioxide gas on the characteristics of induced pluripotent stem cells.Regenerative therapy · 2022Article
- Disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2: A Review.Viruses · 2022Review
- New Countermeasures Against Infections with/after COVID-19: Is Chlorine Dioxide a Useful and Safe Disinfectant?Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2022Article
- Concerns and strategies for wastewater treatment during COVID-19 pandemic to stop plausible transmission.Resources, conservation, and recycling · 2021Review
- Emerging Technologies for Aerial Decontamination of Food Storage Environments to Eliminate Microbial Cross-Contamination.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Effects of continuous exposure to low concentration of ClORegenerative therapy · 2020Article
- Effect of extremely low-concentration gaseous chlorine dioxide against surface Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in wet conditions on glass dishes.BMC research notes · 2020Article
- Biocides and Novel Antimicrobial Agents for the Mitigation of Coronaviruses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Low-cost, Small-scale Decontamination of Laboratory Equipment by Using Chlorine Dioxide Gas.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2019Article
- Use of chlorine dioxide to sterilize medium for tissue culture of potato.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Virucidal Activity of Fogged Chlorine Dioxide- and Hydrogen Peroxide-Based Disinfectants against Human Norovirus and Its Surrogate, Feline Calicivirus, on Hard-to-Reach Surfaces.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- A study of the properties of chlorine dioxide gas as a fumigant.Experimental animals · 2016Article
- Inactivation Kinetics and Mechanism of a Human Norovirus Surrogate on Stainless Steel Coupons via Chlorine Dioxide Gas.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- Six-month low level chlorine dioxide gas inhalation toxicity study with two-week recovery period in rats.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate the efficacy of low-concentration chlorine dioxide (ClO(2)) gas against model microbes in the wet state on a glass surface. METHODS AND
resultsWe set up a test room (39 m(3)) and the ClO(2) gas was produced by a ClO(2) gas generator that continuously releases a constant low-concentration ClO(2) gas. Influenza A virus (Flu-A), feline calicivirus (FCV), Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were chosen as the model microbes. The low-concentration ClO(2) gas (mean 0.05 ppmv, 0.14 mg m(-3)) inactivated Flu-A and E. coli (>5 log(10) reductions) and FCV and S. aureus (>2 log(10) reductions) in the wet state on glass dishes within 5 h.
conclusionsThe treatment of wet environments in the presence of human activity such as kitchens and bathrooms with the low-concentration ClO(2) gas would be useful for reducing the risk of infection by bacteria and viruses residing on the environmental hard surfaces without adverse effects. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study demonstrates that the low-concentration ClO(2) gas (mean 0.05 ppmv) inactivates various kinds of microbes such as Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, enveloped and nonenveloped viruses in the wet state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.