Trial reportArchives of internal medicine2011
Too Little? Too Much? Primary care physicians' views on US health care: a brief report.
Trial report in Archives of internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00853918 (Clinical Practice Intensity), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Practice Intensity: Comparing VA to Private Sector Providers
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Strategies to reduce the use of low-value medical tests in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020Pooled it
- Association Between Reimbursement Incentives and Physician Practice in Oncology: A Systematic Review.JAMA oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- 'They leave at least believing they had a part in the discussion': understanding decision aid use and patient-clinician decision-making through qualitative research.Patient education and counseling · 2013Trial
- Defensive medicine practices and attitudes toward malpractice among physicians in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Low-Value Emergency Care and Racial and Ethnic Differences Across US Children's Hospitals.Pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Provider billing margin and cancer treatment selection: population based cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Futility in healthcare among Mexican female patients with breast cancer in advanced stage: The patient perspective.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- 'The health care system is more like a business'-medical overuse from the patients' perspective in Germany: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Understanding Healthcare Personnel's Perceptions About Reducing Low-Value Care: A Scoping Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Endometrial Cancer Knowledge and Guideline-Concordant Practice Patterns Among First-Line Providers.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Article
- Organizational influences on the use of low-value care in primary health care - a qualitative interview study with physicians in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Article
- Docs with their eyes on the clock? The effect of time pressures on primary care productivity.Journal of health economics · 2021Article
- Orthopaedic cardiac considerations in emergency.SICOT-J · 2021Article
- The Pitfalls of Overtreatment: Why More Care is not Necessarily Beneficial.Asian bioethics review · 2020Article
- Development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020Article
- Is it really always only the others who are to blame? GP's view on medical overuse. A questionnaire study.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byJust listen.2011
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSome believe that a substantial amount of US health care is unnecessary, suggesting that it would be possible to control costs without rationing effective services. The views of primary care physicians-the frontline of health care delivery-are not known.
methodsBetween June and December 2009, we conducted a nationally representative mail survey of US primary care physicians (general internal medicine and family practice) randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile (response rate, 70%; n=627).
resultsForty-two percent of US primary care physicians believe that patients in their own practice are receiving too much care; only 6% said they were receiving too little. The most important factors physicians identified as leading them to practice more aggressively were malpractice concerns (76%), clinical performance measures (52%), and inadequate time to spend with patients (40%). Physicians also believe that financial incentives encourage aggressive practice: 62% said diagnostic testing would be reduced if it did not generate revenue for medical subspecialists (39% for primary care physicians). Almost all physicians (95%) believe that physicians vary in what they would do for identical patients; 76% are interested in learning how aggressive or conservative their own practice style is compared with that of other physicians in their community.
conclusionsMany US primary care physicians believe that their own patients are receiving too much medical care. Malpractice reform, realignment of financial incentives, and more time with patients could remove pressure on physicians to do more than they feel is needed. Physicians are interested in feedback on their practice style, suggesting they may be receptive to change.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00853918.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.