Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21949169›Full record

Trial reportArchives of internal medicine2011

Too Little? Too Much? Primary care physicians' views on US health care: a brief report.

Brenda E Sirovich, Steven Woloshin, Lisa M Schwartz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00853918 (Clinical Practice Intensity), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00853918 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Practice Intensity: Comparing VA to Private Sector Providers

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2009 to 2010Enrolled1,000ConditionsPhysician Survey Response RatesArms$20 cash, $50 cash, $50 check, $100 check
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Strategies to reduce the use of low-value medical tests in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brenda E SirovichVA Outcomes Group, 111B, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 215 N Main St, White River Junction, VT 05009, USA. brenda.sirovich@dartmouth.edu
Steven Woloshin
Lisa M Schwartz

Funding

UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING EPISODE-BASED HOSPITAL CAREP01AG019783 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Leila S. Agha · 2001 to 2026
$52.9M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019783NIA NIH HHS P01 AG19783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome believe that a substantial amount of US health care is unnecessary, suggesting that it would be possible to control costs without rationing effective services. The views of primary care physicians-the frontline of health care delivery-are not known.

methodsBetween June and December 2009, we conducted a nationally representative mail survey of US primary care physicians (general internal medicine and family practice) randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile (response rate, 70%; n=627).

resultsForty-two percent of US primary care physicians believe that patients in their own practice are receiving too much care; only 6% said they were receiving too little. The most important factors physicians identified as leading them to practice more aggressively were malpractice concerns (76%), clinical performance measures (52%), and inadequate time to spend with patients (40%). Physicians also believe that financial incentives encourage aggressive practice: 62% said diagnostic testing would be reduced if it did not generate revenue for medical subspecialists (39% for primary care physicians). Almost all physicians (95%) believe that physicians vary in what they would do for identical patients; 76% are interested in learning how aggressive or conservative their own practice style is compared with that of other physicians in their community.

conclusionsMany US primary care physicians believe that their own patients are receiving too much medical care. Malpractice reform, realignment of financial incentives, and more time with patients could remove pressure on physicians to do more than they feel is needed. Physicians are interested in feedback on their practice style, suggesting they may be receptive to change.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00853918.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDelivery of Health CarePhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality of Health CareHealth Care SurveysHumansPhysician Incentive PlansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21949169
PMCPMC3184847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.