Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21948868›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2012

Accelerating the development of 21st-century toxicology: outcome of a Human Toxicology Project Consortium workshop.

Martin L Stephens, Craig Barrow, Melvin E Andersen, Kim Boekelheide, Paul L Carmichael, Michael P Holsapple, Mark Lafranconi

Abstract readConference ProceedingsHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science · 2016
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification and characterization of adverse effects in 21st century toxicology.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin L StephensThe Humane Society of United States, Washington, District of Columbia 20037, USA. mstephen@jhsph.edu
Craig Barrow
Melvin E Andersen
Kim Boekelheide
Paul L Carmichael
Michael P Holsapple
Mark Lafranconi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) report on "Toxicity Testing in the 21st century" calls for a fundamental shift in the way that chemicals are tested for human health effects and evaluated in risk assessments. The new approach would move toward in vitro methods, typically using human cells in a high-throughput context. The in vitro methods would be designed to detect significant perturbations to "toxicity pathways," i.e., key biological pathways that, when sufficiently perturbed, lead to adverse health outcomes. To explore progress on the report's implementation, the Human Toxicology Project Consortium hosted a workshop on 9-10 November 2010 in Washington, DC. The Consortium is a coalition of several corporations, a research institute, and a non-governmental organization dedicated to accelerating the implementation of 21st-century Toxicology as aligned with the NRC vision. The goal of the workshop was to identify practical and scientific ways to accelerate implementation of the NRC vision. The workshop format consisted of plenary presentations, breakout group discussions, and concluding commentaries. The program faculty was drawn from industry, academia, government, and public interest organizations. Most presentations summarized ongoing efforts to modernize toxicology testing and approaches, each with some overlap with the NRC vision. In light of these efforts, the workshop identified recommendations for accelerating implementation of the NRC vision, including greater strategic coordination and planning across projects (facilitated by a steering group), the development of projects that test the proof of concept for implementation of the NRC vision, and greater outreach and communication across stakeholder communities.

Indexed as

National Academy of Sciences, U.S.AnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesCells, CulturedHistory, 21st CenturyHumansModels, AnimalPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentToxicity TestsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21948868
PMCPMC3262850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.