Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21948653›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2011

DNA microarray analysis identifies CKS2 and LEPR as potential markers of meningioma recurrence.

Francesca Menghi, Francesca N Orzan, Marica Eoli, Mariangela Farinotti, Emanuela Maderna, Federica Pisati, Donatella Bianchessi, Lorella Valletta, Sandro Lodrini, Giuseppe Galli and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. An Overview of Advances in Rare Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Renal Cell Cancer and Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The influence of leptin on the process of carcinogenesis.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca MenghiUnit of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Besta, Milan, Italy.
Francesca N Orzan
Marica Eoli
Mariangela Farinotti
Emanuela Maderna
Federica Pisati
Donatella Bianchessi
Lorella Valletta
Sandro Lodrini
Giuseppe Galli
Elena Anghileri
Serena Pellegatta
Bianca Pollo
Gaetano Finocchiaro
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITIstituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas are the most frequent intracranial tumors. Surgery can be curative, but recurrences are possible. We performed gene expression analyses and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies looking for new markers predicting the recurrence risk. We analyzed expression profiles of 23 meningiomas (10 grade I, 10 grade II, and 3 grade III) and validated the data using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). We performed LOH analysis on 40 meningiomas, investigating chromosomal regions on 1p, 9p, 10q, 14q, and 22q. We found 233 and 268 probe sets to be significantly down- and upregulated, respectively, in grade II or III meningiomas. Genes downregulated in high-grade meningiomas were overrepresented on chromosomes 1, 6, 9, 10, and 14. Based on functional enrichment analysis, we selected LIM domain and actin binding 1 (LIMA1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 (TIMP3), cyclin-dependent kinases regulatory subunit 2 (CKS2), leptin receptor (LEPR), and baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing 5 (BIRC5) for validation using qPCR and confirmed their differential expression in the two groups of tumors. We calculated ΔCt values of CKS2 and LEPR and found that their differential expression (C-L index) was significantly higher in grade I than in grade II or III meningiomas (p < .0001). Interestingly, the C-L index of nine grade I meningiomas from patients who relapsed in <5 years was significantly lower than in grade I meningiomas from patients who did not relapse. These findings indicate that the C-L index may be relevant to define the progression risk in meningioma patients, helping guide their clinical management. A prospective analysis on a larger number of cases is warranted.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarrier ProteinsCDC2-CDC28 KinasesCell Cycle ProteinsDisease ProgressionFemaleGene ExpressionHumansImmunohistochemistryLoss of HeterozygosityMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMicroarray AnalysisNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorCarrier ProteinsCDC2-CDC28 KinasesCell Cycle ProteinsCKS2 protein, humanLEPR protein, humanProtein KinasesReceptors, Leptin

Identifiers

PMID21948653
PMCPMC3228068
OpenAlexW2157684646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.